What Are Your Favorite Math Books for Intuitive Understanding?

  • Thread starter Thread starter MathAmateur
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Books
AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on recommendations for math books that emphasize intuitive understanding rather than traditional textbooks. The original poster enjoys "Prime Obsession" by John Derbyshire for its engaging presentation of mathematical concepts, particularly Euler's proof. Other suggested titles include "Journey Through Genius" by William Dunham, "The Shape of Space" by Jeffrey R. Weeks, and "Gödel, Escher, Bach" by Douglas R. Hofstadter, which is noted for its accessible treatment of Gödel's proof. The community is encouraged to share their favorite math books that feature beautiful proofs and intuitive explanations. Overall, the thread highlights a passion for making complex mathematical ideas more approachable.
MathAmateur
Messages
67
Reaction score
8
I am just an amateur in this math biz, but I love good books on the subject. I am presently reading "Prime Obsession" by John Derbyshire and I am absolutely loving it. Derbyshire's presentation of Euler's proof of the golden key:

<br /> \sum_n n^{-s} = \prod_p (1-p^{-s})^{ -1}<br />

makes me just shiver with delight.

What are some of your favorite math books? Not so much textbooks but books that contain math, preferably beautiful proofs and intuitive presentations of difficult subjects. If this is something that has been thoroughly thrashed in the past and you don't want to bring it up again, send me the links. Otherwise, to start here are my favorites:

1. Journey Through Genius: The Great Theorems of Mathematics by William Dunham
Wow! This book is a feast of great theorems
2.The Shape of Space by Jeffrey R. Weeks
Topology heaven for the math challenged
3. Who Is Fourier?: A Mathematical Adventure by Transnational College of LEX
I finally understood Fourier series and transforms at least at a very elementary level.
4. Gödel, Escher, Bach: An Eternal Golden Braid by Douglas R. Hofstadter
Not a math book, but his presentation of Gödel's proof was accessible to me.
5.Prime Obsession by John Derbyshire
Oh man. What can I say. It is full of gorgeous math. Riemann is turning into one of my heroes for sure.
6. How to Prove It: A Structured Approach by Daniel Velleman
Ha! I can prove things too!
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
You might like
Finding Moonshine by De Sautoy

http://www.conted.ox.ac.uk/staff/academicstaff/profile.php?a=alpha&id=215
 
Thank you. I will.
 
Thread 'Video on imaginary numbers and some queries'
Hi, I was watching the following video. I found some points confusing. Could you please help me to understand the gaps? Thanks, in advance! Question 1: Around 4:22, the video says the following. So for those mathematicians, negative numbers didn't exist. You could subtract, that is find the difference between two positive quantities, but you couldn't have a negative answer or negative coefficients. Mathematicians were so averse to negative numbers that there was no single quadratic...
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. In Dirac’s Principles of Quantum Mechanics published in 1930 he introduced a “convenient notation” he referred to as a “delta function” which he treated as a continuum analog to the discrete Kronecker delta. The Kronecker delta is simply the indexed components of the identity operator in matrix algebra Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/what-exactly-is-diracs-delta-function/ by...
Thread 'Unit Circle Double Angle Derivations'
Here I made a terrible mistake of assuming this to be an equilateral triangle and set 2sinx=1 => x=pi/6. Although this did derive the double angle formulas it also led into a terrible mess trying to find all the combinations of sides. I must have been tired and just assumed 6x=180 and 2sinx=1. By that time, I was so mindset that I nearly scolded a person for even saying 90-x. I wonder if this is a case of biased observation that seeks to dis credit me like Jesus of Nazareth since in reality...
Back
Top