Good or Evil - Which is the better investment?

  • Thread starter Thread starter BobG
  • Start date Start date
AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on the moral implications of investment choices in corporate America, highlighting that investment decisions are primarily driven by expected returns rather than ethical considerations. Participants explore the idea of customizing investments based on personal beliefs, such as funds endorsed by the Catholic Advisory Board that avoid companies involved in pornography, abortion, or same-sex domestic partner benefits, versus those that focus on vice industries like casinos and tobacco. There is a recognition of the humor in the concept, but also an acknowledgment of its validity as a form of democratic expression through financial choices. Some contributors express discomfort with investing in morally questionable industries, while others argue that as long as businesses operate legally and with consent, there is no inherent issue with them. The conversation reflects a tension between moral values and the pursuit of profit, with some leaning towards traditional, amoral investment strategies for long-term stability.
BobG
Science Advisor
Messages
352
Reaction score
88
I thought the article, http://slate.msn.com/id/2123644/ , was an interesting take on investing.

For the most part, corporate America is amoral. Investment decisions are made on expected returns, not how good or evil the companies might be. Now, you can customize your investments by buying funds and investments endorsed by the Catholic Advisory Board (no companies dealing in pornography, abortion, or benefits for same sex domestic partners, etc) or by buying funds that specialize in vice (casinos, tobacco companies, beer companies, etc).

While it seems kind of humorous at first glance, it's actually a valid idea. True democracy in action by backing up your beliefs with your own money - a weapon that has more influence on corporate behavior than a "nice" or "mean" image.

Which would you choose:

http://www.avemariafund.com/avemx.htm ?
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Physics news on Phys.org
The good, I don't like dirty money.

I know people barely 20 who have their own porn website. I would have never guessed a moral person would set up something like that, but they do it just for the money: it's big bussiness. I would never invest any time or money into that.
 
Vice looks like its the better investment at the moment. That said, I doubt either of these constitutes a sound long-term investment. I'd have to go the traditional 'amoral' route.

By the way, I fail to see what's wrong with owning a porn website. As long as the people are consenting - and if your site is legal, they are - who cares? I don't exactly like the idea of investing in the "human failings" business, though, profiting from alcohol and cigarette addiction and gambling and all that. Then again, I suppose many people are addicted to porn. Of course, a porn addiction doesn't physically damage your brain/body or drain the family bank account and the kids' college funds.
 
https://www.newsweek.com/robert-redford-dead-hollywood-live-updates-2130559 Apparently Redford was a somewhat poor student, so was headed to Europe to study art and painting, but stopped in New York and studied acting. Notable movies include Barefoot in the Park (1967 with Jane Fonda), Butch Cassidy and the Sundance Kid (1969, with Paul Newma), Jeremiah Johnson, the political drama The Candidate (both 1972), The Sting (1973 with Paul Newman), the romantic dramas The Way We Were (1973), and...

Similar threads

Replies
22
Views
4K
Replies
4
Views
7K
Back
Top