GR: A First Course Q: What is "That Region" on Page 226?

  • Thread starter Thread starter Jimmy Snyder
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Schutz
Jimmy Snyder
Messages
1,122
Reaction score
22
Here is a question that requires you to have a copy of the book (A First Course in GR) to answer it.

On page 226, near the bottom of the page is this sentence:

The second assumption is called the slow-motion assumption, since it implies that the typical velocity inside the source region, WHICH is \Omega times the size of THAT REGION, should be much less than 1.

Emphasis mine. Can someone tell me what THAT REGION is? If you tell me that THAT REGION is the source region, then I will ask what WHICH refers to.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
jimmysnyder said:
Here is a question that requires you to have a copy of the book (A First Course in GR) to answer it.
On page 226, near the bottom of the page is this sentence:
The second assumption is called the slow-motion assumption, since it implies that the typical velocity inside the source region, WHICH is \Omega times the size of THAT REGION, should be much less than 1.
Emphasis mine. Can someone tell me what THAT REGION is? If you tell me that THAT REGION is the source region, then I will ask what WHICH refers to.

Don't have the book, but the way I read it, "WHICH" refers to the velocity, and THAT REGION is "the source region".

... since it implies that the typical velocity inside the source region, (said velocity) being omega times the size of the source region, should be much less than 1.
 
pervect said:
"WHICH" refers to the velocity, and THAT REGION is "the source region".
You are right. I can be so blind at times. In this case, I was concentrating on the phrase "WHICH is \Omega times the size of THAT REGION", and thinking that he was comparing one region to another. Now I just have to figure out why he can compare a velocity to (the length of?) a region.
 
jimmysnyder said:
Now I just have to figure out why he can compare a velocity to (the length of?) a region.

I'm not sure what "typical" means, but here's a the RMS speed for a toy example.

Consider a 1-dimensional simple harmonic oscillator that moves in a region of length L = 2A.

x(t) = A sin(Omega t)

v(t)^2 = (A Omega cos(Omega t))^2

The average of cos^2 is 1/2, so

<v(t)^2> = 1/2 A^2 Omega^2

RMS v = sqrt(<v^2>) = A Omega/sqrt(2) = (L Omega)/(2 sqrt(2))

I'm not sure that the factor of 2*sqrt(2) is important in the type of estimate that Schutz does.

Regards,
George
 
George Jones said:
I'm not sure that the factor of 2*sqrt(2) is important in the type of estimate that Schutz does.
Not important. He was just giving a justification for the term "slow motion assumption". If he cared about the factor, he could absorb it into the w in slow. I just had time to make a quick response to pervect's post before I ran off to work this morning, but I knew that when I got back home I would have to carry out the calculation that you did for me in your post. Thanks.
 
Thread 'Can this experiment break Lorentz symmetry?'
1. The Big Idea: According to Einstein’s relativity, all motion is relative. You can’t tell if you’re moving at a constant velocity without looking outside. But what if there is a universal “rest frame” (like the old idea of the “ether”)? This experiment tries to find out by looking for tiny, directional differences in how objects move inside a sealed box. 2. How It Works: The Two-Stage Process Imagine a perfectly isolated spacecraft (our lab) moving through space at some unknown speed V...
Does the speed of light change in a gravitational field depending on whether the direction of travel is parallel to the field, or perpendicular to the field? And is it the same in both directions at each orientation? This question could be answered experimentally to some degree of accuracy. Experiment design: Place two identical clocks A and B on the circumference of a wheel at opposite ends of the diameter of length L. The wheel is positioned upright, i.e., perpendicular to the ground...
According to the General Theory of Relativity, time does not pass on a black hole, which means that processes they don't work either. As the object becomes heavier, the speed of matter falling on it for an observer on Earth will first increase, and then slow down, due to the effect of time dilation. And then it will stop altogether. As a result, we will not get a black hole, since the critical mass will not be reached. Although the object will continue to attract matter, it will not be a...
Back
Top