GR: Accelerated Observer's Local Speed of Light

smoothoperator
Messages
37
Reaction score
0
Hi guys,

in GR a free-falling observer will measure the local speed of light as c, like in SR.

My question is will an accelerated (non-inertial) observer locally measure a greater speed than c, or will he also measure the local speed of light as c. For instance, if there is an object that is at rest wrt to Earth, will the speed of light locally increase in that frame, since the object undergoes upward acceleration?

Thanks in advance.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
smoothoperator said:
My question is will an accelerated (non-inertial) observer locally measure a greater speed than c, or will he also measure the local speed of light as c.

The accelerated observer will also measure the local speed of light as ##c##. This can be easily shown by going to an instantaneously comoving local inertial frame of the observer and writing down the speed of a passing light beam relative to this frame; I can show this explicitly if you would like.
 
smoothoperator said:
For instance, if there is an object that is at rest wrt to Earth, will the speed of light locally increase in that frame, since the object undergoes upward acceleration?

By "increase," do you mean will it be greater than normal? Are are you asking whether it will show an increasing trend over time?

If I was going to expect an effect, I would expect it to be an anisotropy, not a trend or a general increase.

The answer to your question may depend on what you mean by the speed of light. We set c=1 in relativistic units, and 1 can't have a different value in an accelerated frame. On the other hand, the Sagnac effect can be interpreted as an anisotropy of the speed of light in a rotating frame.
 
So is it true that locally, no matter what coordinate chart we use, the speed of light always is c in both inertial and non-inertial frames in GR? The coordinate speed of light at some distant point varies with the different choice of a coordinate system?
 
smoothoperator said:
So is it true that locally, no matter what coordinate chart we use, the speed of light always is c in both inertial and non-inertial frames in GR? The coordinate speed of light at some distant point varies with the different choice of a coordinate system?

The problem is that "speed" doesn't mean a lot in noninertial coordinates. Depending on how you define your coordinates, you can get the speed of light to be whatever numerical value you want.

But what is true is that no matter how curved spacetime becomes, you can choose a coordinate system that is approximately inertial in one particular, small region, and in that region, light will have speed c.
 
smoothoperator said:
So is it true that locally, no matter what coordinate chart we use, the speed of light always is c in both inertial and non-inertial frames in GR? The coordinate speed of light at some distant point varies with the different choice of a coordinate system?

Yes precisely. That is exactly correct.
 
In this video I can see a person walking around lines of curvature on a sphere with an arrow strapped to his waist. His task is to keep the arrow pointed in the same direction How does he do this ? Does he use a reference point like the stars? (that only move very slowly) If that is how he keeps the arrow pointing in the same direction, is that equivalent to saying that he orients the arrow wrt the 3d space that the sphere is embedded in? So ,although one refers to intrinsic curvature...
ASSUMPTIONS 1. Two identical clocks A and B in the same inertial frame are stationary relative to each other a fixed distance L apart. Time passes at the same rate for both. 2. Both clocks are able to send/receive light signals and to write/read the send/receive times into signals. 3. The speed of light is anisotropic. METHOD 1. At time t[A1] and time t[B1], clock A sends a light signal to clock B. The clock B time is unknown to A. 2. Clock B receives the signal from A at time t[B2] and...
So, to calculate a proper time of a worldline in SR using an inertial frame is quite easy. But I struggled a bit using a "rotating frame metric" and now I'm not sure whether I'll do it right. Couls someone point me in the right direction? "What have you tried?" Well, trying to help truly absolute layppl with some variation of a "Circular Twin Paradox" not using an inertial frame of reference for whatevere reason. I thought it would be a bit of a challenge so I made a derivation or...

Similar threads

Replies
5
Views
1K
Replies
6
Views
424
Replies
18
Views
1K
Replies
42
Views
717
Replies
13
Views
3K
Replies
53
Views
6K
Back
Top