Gradient Units: For Hooke's Law Graphs

  • Thread starter Thread starter UltraMagnus
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Gradient Units
AI Thread Summary
The discussion clarifies that the gradient of a Hooke's Law graph, which plots extension (in meters) against force (in Newtons), has units of Newtons per meter (N/m) or equivalently Nm^-1. It emphasizes that gradients do require units to accurately represent the relationship between the variables. The conversation confirms that this unit corresponds to the spring constant in Hooke's Law. Additionally, it highlights that for a position versus time graph, the gradient represents velocity, measured in meters per second (m/s). Understanding these units is essential for correctly interpreting the relationships in physics.
UltraMagnus
Messages
3
Reaction score
0
now, this is a rather basic question, but, i can't seem to find the answer...

so anyhow, i always thought that a gradient diddent need units and was just used to compare the change between two things, but i think i may be wrong.

so, if you are plotting extension (m) over force (n) for a hooke's law graph, what unit do you use? or am i right and you don't need one?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
It's Newton/metre. This corresponds to the unit of the constant in Hooke's law.Take another example of plotting the position against time. The gradient gives you the velocity which has units m/s.
 
thanks for the quick reply!

so, (just to confirm) that would be N/m or Nm^-1
 
UltraMagnus said:
thanks for the quick reply!

so, (just to confirm) that would be N/m or Nm^-1
Yes, both refer to the same thing.
 
thanks very much!
 
i was always having that problem as well. thanks for clearing it up
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top