Schools Graduate School: "I want to do it all"

AI Thread Summary
Choosing between engineering, physics, and math is a significant decision for undergraduates, particularly for those pursuing engineering physics while managing a heavy course load. As students approach graduate school, they often seek programs that allow for a focus on mathematical methods. Graduate programs in engineering, such as aerospace or mechanical engineering, can offer opportunities to study computational fluid dynamics, which involves substantial mathematical content. Nuclear engineering may also provide avenues to explore functional analysis, although this is less common. Electrical engineering (EE) is highlighted as a strong option due to its integration of real and complex analysis, probability theory, and differential equations, making it appealing for those with a math background. Control theory is another mathematical field within engineering, though it may be less connected to physics. Overall, students are encouraged to explore various engineering disciplines to find the right balance of math and physics in their graduate studies.
Convuler
Messages
4
Reaction score
0
Choosing between engineering, physics and math is a choice I have been putting off for a long time. I am in my undergrad under engineering physics trying to do it all still by taking 6 courses a semester so that I can still fit in things like real analysis and topology, as well as quantum, EM, and then your typical engineering fare: such as fluid mechanics, heat transfer, etc.

As my time until graduate school shrinks I realize I need to start making some decisions. What I'm wondering is, are there are graduate programs in engineering (or other) where you could focus exclusively on mathematical methods? I've also been interested in nuclear engineering in the past, though I have it in my head that it's possible to study functional analysis in a nuclear engineering program, where might I have read that? Is it true?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Mind you I am not an expert. You could go into a aerospace or mechanical grad school to study computational fluid dynamics which can be math heavy. Or you could even go into some EE grad schools and study plasma's which could have a large mathematical and physics portion to it. Look into those. There are many other routes that are even more mathematical like control theory, but as far as i know that is a bit more removed from the physics aspect;
 
I would go with EE. I did my undergraduate in math and I am finishing a MS in mechanical in the control theory area. The control courses in ME are easier than the ones in EE. From this experience, I am applying to PhD programs in EE. In EE, you get to use analysis both real and complex and probability theory beside the normal differetntial equations.
 
TL;DR Summary: I want to do a PhD in applied math but I hate group theory, is this a big problem? Hello, I am a second-year math and physics double major with a minor in data science. I just finished group theory (today actually), and it was my least favorite class in all of university so far. It doesn't interest me, and I am also very bad at it compared to other math courses I have done. The other courses I have done are calculus I-III, ODEs, Linear Algebra, and Prob/Stats. Is it a...
Yesterday, 9/5/2025, when I was surfing, I found an article The Schwarzschild solution contains three problems, which can be easily solved - Journal of King Saud University - Science ABUNDANCE ESTIMATION IN AN ARID ENVIRONMENT https://jksus.org/the-schwarzschild-solution-contains-three-problems-which-can-be-easily-solved/ that has the derivation of a line element as a corrected version of the Schwarzschild solution to Einstein’s field equation. This article's date received is 2022-11-15...

Similar threads

Replies
20
Views
2K
Replies
7
Views
2K
Replies
32
Views
3K
Replies
5
Views
2K
Replies
2
Views
2K
Replies
7
Views
795
Back
Top