Grand partition function Z of a system

Click For Summary
The grand partition function Z is defined as Z = Ʃ exp((-Ei/KbT) + (μni/KbT)), where Ei represents permitted energy levels, μ is the chemical potential, and ni is the number of particles. The average internal energy U can be expressed as U = Ʃ Pi(Ei - μni), with Pi being the probability of the system in state i. The discussion focuses on proving that U = Kb(T^2)(d(lnZ)/dT) using the relationship between Z and U. Key steps include applying the temperature derivative to the logarithm of Z and understanding the canonical probability distribution. This proof is essential in thermal physics and highlights the connection between statistical mechanics and thermodynamic quantities.
sm09
Messages
9
Reaction score
0
The grand partition function Z of a system is given by formula:

Z = Ʃ exp ((-Ei/KbT) + (μni/KbT))

where , 1, 2... i E i= are permitted energy levels, μ is the chemical
potential, , 1,2... i n i= are number of particles of different types.
Taking into account that averaged internal energy

U = Ʃ Pi(Ei-μni) show that

U = Kb(T^2)(d(lnZ)/dT)

any help?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
The grand partition function is as follows:

\Large{Z = \sum_{i}{e^{(\frac{-\epsilon_i}{kT}) + (\frac{{\mu}n_i}{kT})}}}

Remembering that the expectation value of the energy is the following:

\large{<U> = \sum_{i}{P(i)({\epsilon}_i-{\mu}n_i)}}

(where P(i) is the probability of finding the system in the ith state..)
Show that:

\large{<U> = kT^2\frac{d(ln(Z))}{dT}}

Just dressing up your equations in Latex for the practice. This proof should in a standard Thermal Physics text, but unfortunately I am without mine at the moment :(
 
Last edited:
Note:
<br /> \frac{d}{dT}\ln(Z)=\frac{1}{Z}\frac{dZ}{dT}<br />
also, you should look up the definition of the canonical probability distribution P(\sigma_i). With those definitions, you should be on your way. Also remember that the temperature derivative can pass through the sum in the first equation.
 
Topic about reference frames, center of rotation, postion of origin etc Comoving ref. frame is frame that is attached to moving object, does that mean, in that frame translation and rotation of object is zero, because origin and axes(x,y,z) are fixed to object? Is it same if you place origin of frame at object center of mass or at object tail? What type of comoving frame exist? What is lab frame? If we talk about center of rotation do we always need to specified from what frame we observe?

Similar threads

  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
3K
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
Replies
1
Views
4K
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
1K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K