Graphical Convolution in Physics & Electrical Engineering

  • Thread starter Thread starter sed199
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Convolution
AI Thread Summary
Graphical convolution is applicable in both signal processing and quantum mechanics, allowing for the convolution of functions regardless of whether they are causal or not. While it provides a general approach to solving convolution problems, its use is limited in most math and physics courses, likely due to the assumption that functions are zero for t<0. The mathematical method is often preferred for its simplicity and speed. Despite its versatility, graphical convolution is rarely emphasized outside of electrical engineering contexts. Ultimately, graphical convolution can be utilized for all types of signals, but its practical application is often overshadowed by traditional mathematical methods.
sed199
Messages
4
Reaction score
0
As a double major in physics an electrical engineering, I noticed that graphical convolution is used in both signal processing and quantum mechanics. In my signals course I couldn't help but notice that sometimes the professor would just convolved the function from straight integration, and other times we will have to break the integral into different intervals using Graphical convolution method. The graphical method seems more like a general way of solve convolution problems. Is graphical convolution used when the functions you are to be convolved aren't causal, or that the functions aren't equal to zero when t<0?
 
Engineering news on Phys.org
it doesn't matter. . .you can use graphic convolution for all type of signals .
 
reddvoid said:
it doesn't matter. . .you can use graphic convolution for all type of signals .

But in most math and physics courses graphical convolution isn't used. Is that because it's assumed that h(t) and f(t) are assumed to equal 0 for t<0?
 
while in maths u r supposed to solve it mathematically, that's why graphical method is not used i think. . .
but h(t) or f(t) need not to be 0 for t<0 to use graphical convolution. . .
 
reddvoid said:
while in maths u r supposed to solve it mathematically, that's why graphical method is not used i think. . .
but h(t) or f(t) need not to be 0 for t<0 to use graphical convolution. . .

Graphical convolution can be used in any case, but the mathematical method seems much more simpler and quicker, and I noticed that graphical isn't used much at all in non-electrical engineering courses. Is that because we assume that f(t) and h(t) = 0 for t<0 for math examples?
 
Very basic question. Consider a 3-terminal device with terminals say A,B,C. Kirchhoff Current Law (KCL) and Kirchhoff Voltage Law (KVL) establish two relationships between the 3 currents entering the terminals and the 3 terminal's voltage pairs respectively. So we have 2 equations in 6 unknowns. To proceed further we need two more (independent) equations in order to solve the circuit the 3-terminal device is connected to (basically one treats such a device as an unbalanced two-port...
suppose you have two capacitors with a 0.1 Farad value and 12 VDC rating. label these as A and B. label the terminals of each as 1 and 2. you also have a voltmeter with a 40 volt linear range for DC. you also have a 9 volt DC power supply fed by mains. you charge each capacitor to 9 volts with terminal 1 being - (negative) and terminal 2 being + (positive). you connect the voltmeter to terminal A2 and to terminal B1. does it read any voltage? can - of one capacitor discharge + of the...
Thread 'Weird near-field phenomenon I get in my EM simulation'
I recently made a basic simulation of wire antennas and I am not sure if the near field in my simulation is modeled correctly. One of the things that worry me is the fact that sometimes I see in my simulation "movements" in the near field that seems to be faster than the speed of wave propagation I defined (the speed of light in the simulation). Specifically I see "nodes" of low amplitude in the E field that are quickly "emitted" from the antenna and then slow down as they approach the far...
Back
Top