Graphing a function under a complex mapping

Click For Summary
The discussion focuses on graphing the function f(z) = z + 1/z using a parametric line defined by z(t) = z_0(1-t) + z_1(t). Participants explore how to substitute this parametric equation into f(z) to derive a graphable expression, ultimately leading to a parametric curve represented by functions A(t) and B(t). Additionally, the conversation shifts to graphing a circle using z(t) = re^(it), with the conclusion that for r=1, the result simplifies to 2cos(t). However, there is a correction regarding the approach, emphasizing the need to plot y against x rather than f against t, and cautioning against assuming r=1 without justification. The thread highlights the complexities involved in visualizing complex mappings.
cragar
Messages
2,546
Reaction score
3

Homework Statement


Illustrate the mapping of f(z)=z+\frac{1}{z}
for a parametric line.

The Attempt at a Solution


the equation for a parametric line is z(t)=z_0(1-t)+z_1(t)
so I plug z(t) in for z in f(z), but I don't get an obvious expression on how to graph it,
I tried manipulating it,
Was also wondering if I should represent f(z)=\frac{(z-i)(z+i)}{z}
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Physics news on Phys.org
cragar said:

Homework Statement


Illustrate the mapping of f(z)=z+\frac{1}{z}
for a parametric line.

The Attempt at a Solution


the equation for a parametric line is z(t)=z_0(1-t)+z_1(t)
so I plug z(t) in for z in f(z), but I don't get an obvious expression on how to graph it,
I tried manipulating it,
Was also wondering if I should represent f(z)=\frac{(z-i)(z+i)}{z}
Pick some numerical values ##z_1 = x_1 + i y_1## and ##z_2 = x_2 + i y_2##, then look at ##f(z) = z + 1/z## at ##z = z_1 (1-t) + z_2\, t##:
$$\begin{array}{rcl}f(z) &=&z_1 (1-t) + z_2\, t + \frac{1}{z_1 (1-t) + z_2\, t}\\
&=& \displaystyle (x_1+ i y_1)(1-t) + (x_2 + iy_2) t + \frac{1}{ (x_1+ i y_1)(1-t) + (x_2 + iy_2) t }
\end{array}$$
After some algebra this will have the form ##A(t) + i B(t)## for some functions ##A, B##, so you get a parametric curve of the form ##x = A(t)##, ##y = B(t)## to plot.
 
Last edited:
ok thanks, I also need to do it for a circle, For a circle the
equtation is z(t)=re^{it}
so If I plug this into f(z) I get , and I am assuming r=1 for this e^{it}+e^{-it}
which is 2cos(t), so then Ijust graph 2*cos(t) as my answer.
 
cragar said:
ok thanks, I also need to do it for a circle, For a circle the
equtation is z(t)=re^{it}
so If I plug this into f(z) I get , and I am assuming r=1 for this e^{it}+e^{-it}
which is 2cos(t), so then Ijust graph 2*cos(t) as my answer.
That does not follow the recipe Ray gave you. He explained that you should plot y against x, not f against t.
Also, it would be better to avoid assuming r=1.
 
Question: A clock's minute hand has length 4 and its hour hand has length 3. What is the distance between the tips at the moment when it is increasing most rapidly?(Putnam Exam Question) Answer: Making assumption that both the hands moves at constant angular velocities, the answer is ## \sqrt{7} .## But don't you think this assumption is somewhat doubtful and wrong?

Similar threads

  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
Replies
8
Views
2K
  • · Replies 17 ·
Replies
17
Views
3K
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
2K
Replies
7
Views
2K
Replies
8
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K