Graphing Astroid y(t) & Calculating Tangent Vector

  • Thread starter Thread starter Buri
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Graphing
Click For Summary
The discussion focuses on graphing the Astroid defined by the parametric equations y(t) = (cos³(t), sin³(t)) and calculating its tangent vector. The tangent vector is derived as y'(t) = (-3cos²(t)sin(t), 3sin²(t)cos(t)), which equals zero at points where either sin(t) or cos(t) is zero, corresponding to the four cusps of the astroid. There is confusion regarding why the tangent vector is defined as zero at points (0,1) and (0,-1), with some questioning the validity of these points being defined rather than undefined. Clarification is provided that using the relationship dy/dx helps identify vertical and horizontal tangents, which aligns with the understanding of the astroid's cusps. The discussion concludes with a request for further assistance in understanding the graphing of parametric equations.
Buri
Messages
271
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



Sketch the Astroid y(t) = (cos³(t), sin³(t)). Calculate its tangent vector at each point. At which points is the tangent vector 0?

2. The attempt at a solution

I'm not sure how to go about graphing parametric equations. I calculated the tangent vector:

y'(t) = (-3cos²(t)sin(t), 3sin²(t)cos(t)) and this equals 0 whenever sin(t) = 0 or cos(t) = 0. I have the solution to this question and it says that the points at which y'(t) = 0 correspond to the 4 cusps of the astroid. But I don't even see why this is true. Why is the y'(t) = 0 at (0,1) and (0,-1)? Shouldn't they be undefined?

So could someone please help me out? Maybe tell me what is the general way of graphing parametric equations?

Thanks!
 
Physics news on Phys.org
I've been reading another source and they seem to calculate dy/dx = (dx/dt)/(dz/dt) and state there is a vertical tangent when dz/dt = 0 and dx/dt is nonzero and a horizontal tangent when dx/dt = 0 and dz/dt is nonzero. Using this I do see why the astroid has four cusps. But using the tangent vector which is defined as simply the first derivative doesn't seem to help me. Using the other definition however, I can go about graphing this. Can anyone help me clear up this confusion?
 
Anyone?
 
Question: A clock's minute hand has length 4 and its hour hand has length 3. What is the distance between the tips at the moment when it is increasing most rapidly?(Putnam Exam Question) Answer: Making assumption that both the hands moves at constant angular velocities, the answer is ## \sqrt{7} .## But don't you think this assumption is somewhat doubtful and wrong?

Similar threads

  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
9K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
1K
Replies
8
Views
1K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K