Graphing & Scales Help: Applying 1:300 & 1:20 Scales

  • Thread starter Thread starter twenty5
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Graphing
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion focuses on applying scales of 1:300 for the horizontal axis and 1:20 for the vertical axis to graph elevation data ranging from 200-300 on the Y-axis and 0-17 on the X-axis. The user initially struggled with understanding how to apply these scales on a 17x22 inch vellum paper. After some attempts and community input, the user successfully figured out the scaling process, specifically calculating that 3.33 cm on the horizontal axis represents 1 unit.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of scale representation in graphing
  • Basic knowledge of elevation data interpretation
  • Familiarity with graphing tools and techniques
  • Experience with measuring and plotting on paper
NEXT STEPS
  • Research techniques for accurately applying different scales in graphing
  • Learn about graphing software that can automate scale application
  • Explore best practices for visualizing elevation data
  • Study the principles of creating effective graphs on various media
USEFUL FOR

This discussion is beneficial for students in engineering or geography courses, educators teaching graphing techniques, and anyone involved in data visualization, particularly in relation to elevation and scale application.

twenty5
Messages
93
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


Just looking for some advice!
I have numbers that range from 200 - 300 for the Y axis
and I got some numbers that range from 0 - 17 for the X axis.

(what the numbers basically mean is 200-300 are the elevations for each station of 0-17 on the X axis.

I've been asked to use 1:300 scale for the Horizontal Axis and 1:20 scale for the vertical axis.

I'm totally lost. What I've been trying to figure out is, how the scales are applied. I have a 17x22 Inch vellum piece of paper. All help would be greatly appreciated!

Homework Equations


Horizontal scale 1:300
Vertical Scale 1:20

The Attempt at a Solution


this is from one of my college courses, but there wasn't really any examples given to us. It feels very straight foward but the scales didn't make sense to me. If anyone could, please, just reply with a brief example or solution, and I will try to work it out. Thanks so much in advance!
 
Physics news on Phys.org
the attempt I took so far, as of now is 3.33cm = 1 for the bottom scale... 17 times...

more info, people have also said that there is barely enough room for the graph. and I would assume this would be fine since there is also barely enough room for the graph. I am about to do the vertical scale. Likely going to mess it up. but all help is still welcome.. :( thanks
 
ah nvm. I've figured it out. Thanks for your time and views :)
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
6K
  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
5K
Replies
12
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
3K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
2K
Replies
11
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K