Graphing Non-f(x) Functions on TI-89 Calculator

  • Thread starter Thread starter jaredmt
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Graphing
AI Thread Summary
The TI-89 calculator can graph non-standard functions, such as implicit equations, but requires them to be expressed explicitly in terms of y=f(x) for direct graphing. Users can solve for y using the calculator's capabilities, allowing for the graphing of equations like 2x + 3y = 7. For more complex forms, such as third-degree polynomials in y, the TI-89 can still assist in finding solutions. Additionally, the calculator supports parametric graphing, enabling the representation of implicit functions like circles through parameterization. Programmable features also allow users to create custom solutions for graphing implicit equations directly.
jaredmt
Messages
120
Reaction score
0
i was wondering if i could graph something like:
2x + 3y = 7
or
3y^2 + 2x^2 -3x +6 = 0

where the function doesn't always start with plain f(x). is it possible to do this on ti 89?
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
If y=f(x), then solve for y. If you're asking about things that don't have nice explicit forms, eg a 3rd degree polynomial in y, then yes, the TI-89 can solve those for you.
 
Last edited:
Fairly sure you can only graph explicit functions on the TI-89, so like qntty says, you'll have to solve for y (but the TI-89 will do this for you).
 
Sometimes, but not always, you can write implicitely defined functions in terms of explicit functions of a parameter. For example, you can graph x2+ y2= 1, a circle, in parametric graphing mode with x= cos(t), y= sin(t).
 
Now the TI-89 is programmable so you might search the TI site for packages you can upload to expand its capacities or write your own. At worst you can graph the inequality f(x,y) < 0 by iterating over the coordinates on the visible screen and plotting the ones satisfying the inequality. The boundary will then be your curve.
 
Yes, if you want to graph an implicit equation without having to first solve for a variable, you could easily write a program to solve it and input it into Y1.
 
Thread 'Video on imaginary numbers and some queries'
Hi, I was watching the following video. I found some points confusing. Could you please help me to understand the gaps? Thanks, in advance! Question 1: Around 4:22, the video says the following. So for those mathematicians, negative numbers didn't exist. You could subtract, that is find the difference between two positive quantities, but you couldn't have a negative answer or negative coefficients. Mathematicians were so averse to negative numbers that there was no single quadratic...
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. In Dirac’s Principles of Quantum Mechanics published in 1930 he introduced a “convenient notation” he referred to as a “delta function” which he treated as a continuum analog to the discrete Kronecker delta. The Kronecker delta is simply the indexed components of the identity operator in matrix algebra Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/what-exactly-is-diracs-delta-function/ by...
Thread 'Unit Circle Double Angle Derivations'
Here I made a terrible mistake of assuming this to be an equilateral triangle and set 2sinx=1 => x=pi/6. Although this did derive the double angle formulas it also led into a terrible mess trying to find all the combinations of sides. I must have been tired and just assumed 6x=180 and 2sinx=1. By that time, I was so mindset that I nearly scolded a person for even saying 90-x. I wonder if this is a case of biased observation that seeks to dis credit me like Jesus of Nazareth since in reality...
Back
Top