Graphite Moderator Explained: Carbon's Atomic Structure & Neutron Moderation

  • Thread starter Thread starter Johnleprekan
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Graphite Moderator
Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion centers on the properties of carbon, particularly in its graphite form, as a neutron moderator. Participants explore the atomic structure of carbon and its implications for neutron scattering and moderation, touching on comparisons with other materials and historical context related to reactor design.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory
  • Technical explanation
  • Historical

Main Points Raised

  • One participant asks for a layman's explanation of why carbon, especially in graphite form, has a high scattering cross section and its effectiveness as a neutron moderator.
  • Another participant discusses the importance of mass similarity between neutrons and target nuclei for effective scattering, noting that hydrogen is optimal but has absorption issues, while carbon is favored for its cost and solid state.
  • A participant mentions carbon's high binding energy per nucleon compared to helium-4, its low absorption cross-section, and its favorable physical properties like melting point and atomic density.
  • Historical context is provided regarding the Windscale reactor, highlighting the use of graphite as a moderator and the associated risks, including the phenomenon of "Wigner energy" and the reactor accident in 1957.
  • Another participant reiterates the initial question about carbon's scattering cross section, noting the atomic spacing in graphite's crystalline structure relative to thermal neutron wavelengths.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants express various viewpoints on the properties of carbon as a neutron moderator, with no consensus reached on the best comparison materials or the implications of graphite's use in reactors. The discussion remains unresolved regarding the optimal characteristics for neutron moderation.

Contextual Notes

Participants mention several factors influencing the effectiveness of neutron moderators, including atomic structure, binding energy, and chemical stability, but do not resolve the implications of these factors in practical applications.

Johnleprekan
Messages
55
Reaction score
0
Can someone explain to me, in layman's terms, why carbon (especially graphite) has a high scattering cross section? What is it about carbon's atomic structure that makes it a good neutron moderator?
 
Engineering news on Phys.org
High compared to what?
To slow down neutrons, it is useful to have targets with a mass similar to the neutron mass:
- If you throw an elastic ball on a wall (~heavy nucleus), it will bounce back with the same energy
- If you throw it on another ball (~light nucleus), both will receive a part of the kinetic energy
- And if you hit a fly with it (~electron), it will just continue to fly in the initial direction

Hydrogen has the best mass. But protium (1 proton, 0 neutrons) can absorb the neutron, and deuterium in large amounts is expensive.
Helium is a gas, which is bad for the required density.
Lithium has some safety issues, and the additional neutron absorption problem (in Li-6)
No idea about beryllium. It is toxic, but you don't want to get in contact with anything in the reactor core anyway.
Boron is fine if you want to absorb neutrons... ;)
Carbon (especially graphite) is cheap and solid within a useful range of temperatures
 
Carbon has a high binding energy per nucleon, which is slightly higher than than of He-4.
http://www.nndc.bnl.gov/chart/reCenter.jsp?z=5&n=5 (click on BE/A to see binding energy pre nucleon, and use Zoom 1)

It has a relatively low absorption cross-section, and atomically/chemically it has a high melting point and reasonable atomic density, as compared to those properties of the neighboring elements.

Be and BeO are good moderators too, but there is the issue of toxicity.


One also has to be concerned with chemical stability in addition to neutron absorption.
 
Last edited:
Thank you.
 
One of the first reactors in Britain was the air-cooled Windscale reactor built in 1950-51 It had a solid graphite core, with metallic uranium fuel cartridges inserted into channels in the graphite. Wigner predicted that graphite, when bombarded by neutrons, could build up stored potential energy ("Wigner energy") in atomic crystalline dislocations. Periodically the dislocations had to be annealed out by running the air-cooled reactor at reduced power to gradually raise the reactor core temperature and slowly anneal the graphite. The annealing process is exothermic, and the stored energy is released as as heat. In 1957, the annealing process overheated the core, causing the graphite to overheat and catch fire, leading to the uncontrolled release of radioactivity into the environment. This was the most serious reactor accident in British history. So although graphite is a good neutron moderator, it has serious shortcomings when used in a reactor. See http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Windscale_fire
 
Johnleprekan said:
Can someone explain to me, in layman's terms, why carbon (especially graphite) has a high scattering cross section? What is it about carbon's atomic structure that makes it a good neutron moderator?

The distance between carbon atoms in graphite's crystalline structure is about the same as the wavelength of a thermal neutron.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
3K
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 15 ·
Replies
15
Views
5K
Replies
5
Views
2K
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
3K
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 0 ·
Replies
0
Views
2K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
3K