Graphite's delocalised electron?

  • Thread starter Thread starter pivoxa15
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Electron
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

Graphite's structure involves three covalently bonded electrons per carbon atom, with one delocalised electron that shares among neighboring carbon atoms. This delocalisation leads to a covalent nature, challenging the need for fixed double bonds. The discussion highlights that the delocalised electron does not imply fixed double bonds, as it participates in resonance structures, similar to benzene. The electrons form a continuous molecular bond, creating an electronic cloud above and below the plane of the graphite layers.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of covalent bonding and electron delocalisation
  • Familiarity with resonance structures in organic chemistry
  • Knowledge of molecular orbital theory
  • Basic concepts of graphite's layered structure
NEXT STEPS
  • Study molecular orbital theory in depth
  • Research the properties and applications of graphene
  • Explore the concept of resonance in more complex organic molecules
  • Investigate the differences between localized and delocalized electrons
USEFUL FOR

Chemistry students, materials scientists, and professionals interested in the properties of carbon allotropes and their applications in technology.

pivoxa15
Messages
2,250
Reaction score
1
They say 3 of graphite's electrons are covalently bonded and the other one is delocalised. But it shares among the other carbon atoms as well as having it itself because no carbon atom is charged in graphite. But that means it is very much covalent in nature? Why not have a double bond somewhere to explain the extra delocalised electron in every carbon atom in graphite? Or is it the case that they want to say that this electron is not fixed so can double bond with any of the three neighbouring carbon atoms?

Is that different to saying it forms a double bond since a double bond in reality means a reasonance structure where the bonding is not fixed anyway.
 
Last edited:
Chemistry news on Phys.org
pivoxa15 said:
They say 3 of graphite's electrons are covalently bonded and the other one is delocalised. But it shares among the other carbon atoms as well as having it itself because no carbon atom is charged in graphite. But that means it is very much covalent in nature? Why not have a double bond somewhere to explain the extra delocalised electron in every carbon atom in graphite? Or is it the case that they want to say that this electron is not fixed so can double bond with any of the three neighbouring carbon atoms?

Is that different to saying it forms a double bond since a double bond in reality means a reasonance structure where the bonding is not fixed anyway.
Did you study Benzene? It's the same principle. To see the resonance as an alternating formation of single/double bonds is not exact. Actually the electrons forms an entire molecular bond, that is, it is effectively delocalized in all the molecule, that is, the electronic "cloud" is made of two doghnuts over the plane of the molecule, on opposite sides.

In graphite, all the Benzene rings become one, in this sense: the electrons are delocalized in all the plane of the molecules, above and under.
Many planes of molecules = many layers.
 
pivoxa15 said:
But that means it is very much covalent in nature? Why not have a double bond somewhere to explain the extra delocalised electron in every carbon atom in graphite?
Because covalent bonds (including double bonds) are localized in nature.

Is that different to saying it forms a double bond since a double bond in reality means a reasonance structure where the bonding is not fixed anyway.
A double bond is not a resonance hybrid. It is, an approximation based on overlap of localized, independent atomic orbitals (typically, but not necessarily, one sigma overlap and one pi overlap).

("Independent" means that I can write the many-electron wavefunction as a product of many single-particle wavefunctions).
 
Last edited:

Similar threads

  • · Replies 34 ·
2
Replies
34
Views
5K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
878
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
2K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
3K
Replies
3
Views
2K
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
11K