How does the theory of general relativity explain gravity?

  • Thread starter Thread starter San K
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Gravity
San K
Messages
905
Reaction score
1
Not sure whether this post should be in the relativity forum. However a few years down the line it could be in-between relativity and QM.

What is the process of creation of gravity?

How does gravity effect two quantum entangled photons?...say when one of them passes through a bend in space-time...like the one that surrounds the earth.

Mass bends space-time. What does space-time bend in? Is there still a straight line (that would be without gravity) when space time is bent?

Can a hole/tear be created in space-time?

Which things are unaffected by gravity?

What is the effect of gravity on gyroscopes?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
That's a very wide range of questions - a great deal has been written on all of them.

What have you done to attempt to discover the answers.

Note: gravity is currently best understood in terms of general relativity.
You have not asked anything that remotely approaches quantum gravity.

1. it is not something that gets created as such - it is just there, and is strongly related to energy densities.

2. what we mean by the curvature of space time is well defined in GR - think of it as a metaphor: in GR, "space-time" is not thought of as bending inside some higher-order meta-volume. The word is used to describe the kind of maths you get.

3. Define "hole" or "tear". If you are thinking in terms of tearing a fabric then: no.

4. Nothing known.

5. Same as on anything else.

If you are just starting out then try:
http://www.space.com/17661-theory-general-relativity.html
 
Last edited:
Not an expert in QM. AFAIK, Schrödinger's equation is quite different from the classical wave equation. The former is an equation for the dynamics of the state of a (quantum?) system, the latter is an equation for the dynamics of a (classical) degree of freedom. As a matter of fact, Schrödinger's equation is first order in time derivatives, while the classical wave equation is second order. But, AFAIK, Schrödinger's equation is a wave equation; only its interpretation makes it non-classical...
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. Towards the end of the first lecture for the Qiskit Global Summer School 2025, Foundations of Quantum Mechanics, Olivia Lanes (Global Lead, Content and Education IBM) stated... Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/quantum-entanglement-is-a-kinematic-fact-not-a-dynamical-effect/ by @RUTA
Is it possible, and fruitful, to use certain conceptual and technical tools from effective field theory (coarse-graining/integrating-out, power-counting, matching, RG) to think about the relationship between the fundamental (quantum) and the emergent (classical), both to account for the quasi-autonomy of the classical level and to quantify residual quantum corrections? By “emergent,” I mean the following: after integrating out fast/irrelevant quantum degrees of freedom (high-energy modes...
Back
Top