Gravitation and Binomial Expansion

AI Thread Summary
The discussion revolves around using the binomial expansion to derive how gravitational acceleration (g) changes with height above the Earth's surface. The participant initially struggles with applying the binomial expansion to the gravitational formula, specifically substituting values and determining the correct exponent. They express uncertainty about whether to substitute 2 for the exponent n in their calculations. Ultimately, the participant resolves their confusion independently, indicating a successful understanding of the concept. The thread highlights the application of binomial expansion in gravitational physics.
novicephysicist
Messages
2
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


Use the binomial expansion (1± x)n = 1± nx + (n(n-1)/2) x2 ±...
to show that the value of g is altered by approximately Δg ≈ -2g(Δr/rE) at a height Δr above the Earth's surface, where rE is the radius of the Earth, as long as Δr<<rE

Homework Equations



g=GM/r2

The Attempt at a Solution


I had completely forgotten binomial expansions, so I looked it up and found an equation that seemed to apply:
x=Δr/rE
and then
(Δr±rE) = rEn(1±Δr/rE)n
I plugged this into the equation for gravitational acceleration and got
g=GM/[rEn(1±Δr/rE)n]2
I'm not sure if I should substitute 2 for the n? Honestly I'm not sure where to go from here at all. Hopefully I did something correctly? (Note: this is my first time on Physics Forums, so I hope I formatted this correctly and everything)

Any help would be appreciated, thank you :)
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Never mind, I figured it out!
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'Collision of a bullet on a rod-string system: query'
In this question, I have a question. I am NOT trying to solve it, but it is just a conceptual question. Consider the point on the rod, which connects the string and the rod. My question: just before and after the collision, is ANGULAR momentum CONSERVED about this point? Lets call the point which connects the string and rod as P. Why am I asking this? : it is clear from the scenario that the point of concern, which connects the string and the rod, moves in a circular path due to the string...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top