Gravitation(angular deflection of a planet from a massive star)

AI Thread Summary
To calculate the angular deflection of a planet passing near a massive star, one can use the principles of angular momentum and the initial and final perpendicular distances from the star's center. The behavior of the planet during this close encounter can be predicted by analyzing its motion as a solution to the Kepler problem, which describes the motion of celestial bodies under gravitational influence. It is essential to treat both the planet and star as perfectly spherical for accurate calculations. Understanding the velocity changes and gravitational effects during the encounter will aid in predicting the trajectory. This approach provides a framework for analyzing gravitational interactions in astrophysical scenarios.
ErwinMoses
Messages
7
Reaction score
0
i was just thinking , a planet comes close to a very massive star but doesn't collide .how can i calculate the its angular deflection.?

i can calculate the velocity afterwards the deflection(given the initial and final perpendicular distances of its course from center of the star) using angular momentum principle,but how can i predict the behavior of the planet during such an event?

i am considering the planets and stars to perfectly spherical.
no idea how to start.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
You can calculate the "orbital" parameters (even if it is not a proper orbit). The motion is a solution of the Kepler problem (=google keyword).
 
thanks.
 
I think it's easist first to watch a short vidio clip I find these videos very relaxing to watch .. I got to thinking is this being done in the most efficient way? The sand has to be suspended in the water to move it to the outlet ... The faster the water , the more turbulance and the sand stays suspended, so it seems to me the rule of thumb is the hose be aimed towards the outlet at all times .. Many times the workers hit the sand directly which will greatly reduce the water...
comparing a flat solar panel of area 2π r² and a hemisphere of the same area, the hemispherical solar panel would only occupy the area π r² of while the flat panel would occupy an entire 2π r² of land. wouldn't the hemispherical version have the same area of panel exposed to the sun, occupy less land space and can therefore increase the number of panels one land can have fitted? this would increase the power output proportionally as well. when I searched it up I wasn't satisfied with...
Back
Top