Gravitation Force on the Earth's Centre

  • Thread starter Thread starter xCross
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Force Gravitation
AI Thread Summary
The discussion clarifies that while Newton's gravitational law suggests infinite force at the center of a mass (where r=0), this does not apply inside a solid sphere. Inside such a sphere, gravitational force is linearly proportional to the distance from the center, leading to zero force at the center due to symmetrical cancellation of gravitational pulls from surrounding mass. The mass contributing to gravitational force is only that within a smaller radius, resulting in a force proportional to r rather than 1/r^2. Additionally, the pressure at the Earth's center, caused by the mass above, is a separate calculation and is not zero. Understanding these principles resolves the apparent contradiction in gravitational force at the Earth's center.
xCross
Messages
15
Reaction score
0
I am having some problem understanding this.. By Newtons Gravitation Law we know:

F=Gm1m2/r^2

centre of the particle means r=0, am I right? if so, the equation says that the force will be infinite on the centre of the earth.. but we see that it has 0 force on the centre.. why such thing happened??
 
Astronomy news on Phys.org
xCross said:
I am having some problem understanding this.. By Newtons Gravitation Law we know:

F=Gm1m2/r^2

centre of the particle means r=0, am I right? if so, the equation says that the force will be infinite on the centre of the earth.. but we see that it has 0 force on the centre.. why such thing happened??
That is the formula for the gravitational force of a point mass which can also be shown, by integrating over the volume of a sphere, to be the force of a spherical mass on any point outside the sphere.

Inside the sphere, if, say r< r0, where r0 is the radius of the sphere, it can be shown that the force for the mass outside distance r cancels. (The mass on "this" side pulls upward, on "that" side pulls downward and so cancel.) That is, only the mass for radius < r gives a non-zero total contribution to the force. Since mass (assuming constant density) is proportional to volume which is proportional to r3, the mass of a sphere of radius r inside a uniform sphere of radius r0 of mass M is Mr3/r03.

Putting that together with GmM/r2, the force on an object at distance r from the center of the sphere is Gm(Mr3/r03)/r2 and so is proportional to r, not 1/r2. Of course, at the center of the Earth r= 0 and so the gravitational force is 0. (Again, because of the symmetry of the sphere and the assumed constant density, the gravitational force from any "bit" of matter in the Earth is canceled by the force of a diametrically opposite "bit" of matter.)

Oh, and that does not mean that the PRESSURE on something at the center of the Earth due to the mass above it would be 0. That's a completely different calculation.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Publication: Redox-driven mineral and organic associations in Jezero Crater, Mars Article: NASA Says Mars Rover Discovered Potential Biosignature Last Year Press conference The ~100 authors don't find a good way this could have formed without life, but also can't rule it out. Now that they have shared their findings with the larger community someone else might find an explanation - or maybe it was actually made by life.
TL;DR Summary: In 3 years, the Square Kilometre Array (SKA) telescope (or rather, a system of telescopes) should be put into operation. In case of failure to detect alien signals, it will further expand the radius of the so-called silence (or rather, radio silence) of the Universe. Is there any sense in this or is blissful ignorance better? In 3 years, the Square Kilometre Array (SKA) telescope (or rather, a system of telescopes) should be put into operation. In case of failure to detect...
This thread is dedicated to the beauty and awesomeness of our Universe. If you feel like it, please share video clips and photos (or nice animations) of space and objects in space in this thread. Your posts, clips and photos may by all means include scientific information; that does not make it less beautiful to me (n.b. the posts must of course comply with the PF guidelines, i.e. regarding science, only mainstream science is allowed, fringe/pseudoscience is not allowed). n.b. I start this...
Back
Top