Gravitational Attraction, Electromagnetic Radiation and Dark Matter

AI Thread Summary
The discussion explores the idea that electromagnetic (EM) radiation may exert a gravitational attraction on mass, based on the principles of gravitational lensing. It posits that the gravitational force from a single photon is proportional to its energy and inversely related to the distance from the mass, although this force is extremely weak. The conversation suggests that when considering the total EM radiation in a galaxy, this gravitational effect could become significant and potentially explain the motion of outer objects, possibly serving as a candidate for dark matter. Participants encourage calculations to estimate the ratio of EM radiation energy to rest mass energy, using the sun as a reference point. The overall consensus acknowledges the theoretical basis for EM radiation acting as a gravitational source, despite its minimal impact.
esmeralda4
Messages
52
Reaction score
0
Since we can observe gravitational lensing and conclude that mass can affect the path of EM radiation it seems logical to me to assume that EM radiation will exert a slight gravitational attraction of it's own on a mass,- although I do not recall ever reading about this.

Presumably the gravitational attraction that a single photon of EM radiation will exert is proportional to it's mass where m=E/c(squared) and the distance between the photon and the mass. Clearly we are considering an incredibly weak force if this is to be calculated.

However, if the total gravitational attraction due to the total EM radiation within a galaxy is calculated this would now become significant. Could this explain the observed motion of the outermost objects within galaxies and therefore be a candidate for dark matter?

Many thanks for reading.
 
Astronomy news on Phys.org
esmeralda4 said:
Since we can observe gravitational lensing and conclude that mass can affect the path of EM radiation it seems logical to me to assume that EM radiation will exert a slight gravitational attraction of it's own on a mass,- although I do not recall ever reading about this.

Presumably the gravitational attraction that a single photon of EM radiation will exert is proportional to it's mass where m=E/c(squared) and the distance between the photon and the mass. Clearly we are considering an incredibly weak force if this is to be calculated.

However, if the total gravitational attraction due to the total EM radiation within a galaxy is calculated this would now become significant. Could this explain the observed motion of the outermost objects within galaxies and therefore be a candidate for dark matter?

Many thanks for reading.

It is true that in theory the energy of EM radiation should act as a gravitational source, but the effect is incredibly tiny.

Given that the energy of the EM radiation emitted by the material in a galaxy comes from its rest mass, I'd guess that the fraction of the total energy in the form of EM radiation would be extremely small.

Why not do a calculation to estimate the ratio of EM radiation energy to rest energy, at least very roughly, by using the sun as an example? You can calculate the amount of energy the sun radiates away (look up "solar luminosity") on a time scale corresponding to the radius of a galaxy at light speed, then compare the mass of that energy to the mass of the sun.
 
TL;DR Summary: In 3 years, the Square Kilometre Array (SKA) telescope (or rather, a system of telescopes) should be put into operation. In case of failure to detect alien signals, it will further expand the radius of the so-called silence (or rather, radio silence) of the Universe. Is there any sense in this or is blissful ignorance better? In 3 years, the Square Kilometre Array (SKA) telescope (or rather, a system of telescopes) should be put into operation. In case of failure to detect...
Thread 'Could gamma-ray bursts have an intragalactic origin?'
This is indirectly evidenced by a map of the distribution of gamma-ray bursts in the night sky, made in the form of an elongated globe. And also the weakening of gamma radiation by the disk and the center of the Milky Way, which leads to anisotropy in the possibilities of observing gamma-ray bursts. My line of reasoning is as follows: 1. Gamma radiation should be absorbed to some extent by dust and other components of the interstellar medium. As a result, with an extragalactic origin, fewer...
Both have short pulses of emission and a wide spectral bandwidth, covering a wide variety of frequencies: "Fast Radio Bursts (FRBs) are detected over a wide range of radio frequencies, including frequencies around 1400 MHz, but have also been detected at lower frequencies, particularly in the 400–800 MHz range. Russian astronomers recently detected a powerful burst at 111 MHz, expanding our understanding of the FRB range. Frequency Ranges: 1400 MHz: Many of the known FRBs have been detected...
Back
Top