Gravitational Binding Energy in GR

StateOfTheEqn
Messages
73
Reaction score
0
What is the gravitational binding energy in GR in the spherically symmetric case?

I calculate ##E=mc^2(1-\frac{1}{\sqrt{1-\frac{r_s}{R}}})##

where ##m## is the mass of the body, ##r_s## is the Schwarzschild radius, and ##R## is the area radius as in the Birkhoff theorem.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
For a spherically symmetric static star it is ##E = M_p - M## where ##M_p## is the total proper mass of the star and ##M## is the total mass of the star.
 
StateOfTheEqn said:
What is the gravitational binding energy in GR in the spherically symmetric case?

I calculate ##E=mc^2(1-\frac{1}{\sqrt{1-\frac{r_s}{R}}})##

where ##m## is the mass of the body, ##r_s## is the Schwarzschild radius, and ##R## is the area radius as in the Birkhoff theorem.

We need a bit more information, were you assuming a constant density interior?
 
pervect said:
We need a bit more information, were you assuming a constant density interior?

We can assume the mass of a star is concentrated at a single point and a body of mass ##m## is a distance ##R## from the point. The binding energy is the energy required to move the body of mass ##m## from ##R## to infinity.

Essentially I am asking what is the GR counterpart to the Newtonian formula ##-\frac{GMm}{r}##.

In my calculations I derived ##E=mc^2(1-\frac{1}{k})## where ##k=\sqrt{1-\frac{r_s}{R}}## and ##r_s## is the Schwarzschild radius.
 
MTW's gravitation has a formula for binding energy on pg 604, but their formula won't converge for the case which you describe. Certainly if you plug 0 into the Newtonian formula you won't get a finite binding energy.

Note: MTW's expression uses geometric units, where G=1.

I believe a taylor series expansion of MTW's formula will show that it gives an answer which is always greater than the Newtonian one, so I don't see how you can get any value other than infinity when r=0.

MTW's formula:
-\int_0^r \rho \left[ \left( 1-2m/r \right)^{-\frac{1}{2}} -1 \right] \,4 \pi r^2 dr

##\rho## is the density, which in general a function of r that depends on the equation of state of whatever is composing the mass. m is not the total mass, but the mass inside radius r, so it's also a function of r. ##\rho## is the proper density, i.e. the density in a locally Minkowskii frame.

[add]
## m(r) = \int 4 \pi r^2 \rho dr## see pg 603. This equation for m(r) is only valid in Schwarzschild coordinates.

Taylor expansion for m/r < 1
-\int_0^r \rho \left[ \frac{1}{2} \frac{2m}{r} + \frac{3}{8} \left( \frac{2m}{r} \right) ^2 + \frac{5}{16} \left( \frac{2m}{r} \right)^3 + ... \right] 4 \pi r^2 dr<br />

If you take only the first term of the taylor series expansion, you get the Newtonian result.
 
Last edited:
Thread 'Can this experiment break Lorentz symmetry?'
1. The Big Idea: According to Einstein’s relativity, all motion is relative. You can’t tell if you’re moving at a constant velocity without looking outside. But what if there is a universal “rest frame” (like the old idea of the “ether”)? This experiment tries to find out by looking for tiny, directional differences in how objects move inside a sealed box. 2. How It Works: The Two-Stage Process Imagine a perfectly isolated spacecraft (our lab) moving through space at some unknown speed V...
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. The Relativator was sold by (as printed) Atomic Laboratories, Inc. 3086 Claremont Ave, Berkeley 5, California , which seems to be a division of Cenco Instruments (Central Scientific Company)... Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/relativator-circular-slide-rule-simulated-with-desmos/ by @robphy
In Philippe G. Ciarlet's book 'An introduction to differential geometry', He gives the integrability conditions of the differential equations like this: $$ \partial_{i} F_{lj}=L^p_{ij} F_{lp},\,\,\,F_{ij}(x_0)=F^0_{ij}. $$ The integrability conditions for the existence of a global solution ##F_{lj}## is: $$ R^i_{jkl}\equiv\partial_k L^i_{jl}-\partial_l L^i_{jk}+L^h_{jl} L^i_{hk}-L^h_{jk} L^i_{hl}=0 $$ Then from the equation: $$\nabla_b e_a= \Gamma^c_{ab} e_c$$ Using cartesian basis ## e_I...
Back
Top