Gravitational Binding Energy in GR

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The gravitational binding energy in General Relativity (GR) for a spherically symmetric case is defined by the equation E=mc²(1−1/√(1−rₛ/R)), where m is the mass of the body, rₛ is the Schwarzschild radius, and R is the area radius. This formula contrasts with the Newtonian binding energy, which is expressed as -GMm/r. The discussion highlights that MTW's formula for binding energy does not converge for certain cases and suggests that a Taylor series expansion can demonstrate that GR binding energy is always greater than the Newtonian counterpart. The proper density, ρ, is a function of r and is crucial for calculating mass within a radius in Schwarzschild coordinates.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of General Relativity (GR) principles
  • Familiarity with Schwarzschild radius and coordinates
  • Knowledge of binding energy concepts in physics
  • Proficiency in calculus, particularly Taylor series expansions
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the derivation of gravitational binding energy in GR using MTW's formula
  • Explore the implications of constant density assumptions in GR
  • Learn about the Birkhoff theorem and its applications in spherically symmetric solutions
  • Investigate the role of proper density in calculating mass in GR
USEFUL FOR

Physicists, astrophysicists, and students of General Relativity seeking to deepen their understanding of gravitational binding energy in spherically symmetric cases.

StateOfTheEqn
Messages
73
Reaction score
0
What is the gravitational binding energy in GR in the spherically symmetric case?

I calculate ##E=mc^2(1-\frac{1}{\sqrt{1-\frac{r_s}{R}}})##

where ##m## is the mass of the body, ##r_s## is the Schwarzschild radius, and ##R## is the area radius as in the Birkhoff theorem.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
For a spherically symmetric static star it is ##E = M_p - M## where ##M_p## is the total proper mass of the star and ##M## is the total mass of the star.
 
StateOfTheEqn said:
What is the gravitational binding energy in GR in the spherically symmetric case?

I calculate ##E=mc^2(1-\frac{1}{\sqrt{1-\frac{r_s}{R}}})##

where ##m## is the mass of the body, ##r_s## is the Schwarzschild radius, and ##R## is the area radius as in the Birkhoff theorem.

We need a bit more information, were you assuming a constant density interior?
 
pervect said:
We need a bit more information, were you assuming a constant density interior?

We can assume the mass of a star is concentrated at a single point and a body of mass ##m## is a distance ##R## from the point. The binding energy is the energy required to move the body of mass ##m## from ##R## to infinity.

Essentially I am asking what is the GR counterpart to the Newtonian formula ##-\frac{GMm}{r}##.

In my calculations I derived ##E=mc^2(1-\frac{1}{k})## where ##k=\sqrt{1-\frac{r_s}{R}}## and ##r_s## is the Schwarzschild radius.
 
MTW's gravitation has a formula for binding energy on pg 604, but their formula won't converge for the case which you describe. Certainly if you plug 0 into the Newtonian formula you won't get a finite binding energy.

Note: MTW's expression uses geometric units, where G=1.

I believe a taylor series expansion of MTW's formula will show that it gives an answer which is always greater than the Newtonian one, so I don't see how you can get any value other than infinity when r=0.

MTW's formula:
-\int_0^r \rho \left[ \left( 1-2m/r \right)^{-\frac{1}{2}} -1 \right] \,4 \pi r^2 dr

##\rho## is the density, which in general a function of r that depends on the equation of state of whatever is composing the mass. m is not the total mass, but the mass inside radius r, so it's also a function of r. ##\rho## is the proper density, i.e. the density in a locally Minkowskii frame.

[add]
## m(r) = \int 4 \pi r^2 \rho dr## see pg 603. This equation for m(r) is only valid in Schwarzschild coordinates.

Taylor expansion for m/r < 1
-\int_0^r \rho \left[ \frac{1}{2} \frac{2m}{r} + \frac{3}{8} \left( \frac{2m}{r} \right) ^2 + \frac{5}{16} \left( \frac{2m}{r} \right)^3 + ... \right] 4 \pi r^2 dr<br />

If you take only the first term of the taylor series expansion, you get the Newtonian result.
 
Last edited:

Similar threads

  • · Replies 43 ·
2
Replies
43
Views
4K
  • · Replies 30 ·
2
Replies
30
Views
5K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
3K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 34 ·
2
Replies
34
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
1K
  • · Replies 16 ·
Replies
16
Views
1K
  • · Replies 19 ·
Replies
19
Views
3K
  • · Replies 15 ·
Replies
15
Views
2K