Gravitational Field problem Question

AI Thread Summary
The discussion revolves around calculating the gravitational field at a corner of a square due to three masses positioned at the other corners. The gravitational field is expressed as a vector sum of contributions from each mass, with specific attention to the angles and distances involved. Participants clarify the need to consider the direction of the gravitational forces and how to combine them correctly. There is confusion regarding the magnitude of the resulting gravitational field and the proper method to express it. Ultimately, a solution is proposed that combines the effects of the two smaller masses and the larger mass into a single expression.
jessedevin
Messages
66
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



Three objects -- two of mass m and one of mass M -- are located at three corners of a square of edge length l. Find the gravitational field g at the fourth corner due to these objects. (Express your answers in terms of the edge length l, the masses m and M, and the gravitational constant G).

p14-03alt.gif


Homework Equations



g=-GM/r2

The Attempt at a Solution



g= ga+gb+gc
g= Gm/l2 \hat{i}+ (GM/(l\sqrt{2})2)(cos(\pi/4)\hat{i}+sin(\pi/4)\hat{j})+Gm/l2 \hat{j}

I know you have to take the magnitude of this, but when I did that , I still get the wrong answer. Here's what I got:

||g||=\sqrt{2G^2/l^4(m^2+M^2)}

Did I start it right? Can someone help?
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
Isn't the gravitational field given by GM/r ?

You have 3 vectors to add, but happily the 2 m's at right angles gives one lying in the direction of M

So ... √2Gm/L + GM/(√2*L) = √2*G*(m + M/2)/L ?
 
LowlyPion said:
Isn't the gravitational field given by GM/r ?

You have 3 vectors to add, but happily the 2 m's at right angles gives one lying in the direction of M

So ... √2Gm/L + GM/(√2*L) = √2*G*(m + M/2)/L ?

So do you take the magnitude of that? I am still confused, because my book says otherwise. Can you go through your process?
 
I think what you did originally is correct, but it ask for the magnitude without the vector sign. So just put down the answer using c^2 = a^2 + b^2 and then I believe you have to indicate the degree according to the x-axis. I'm doing a similar problem. Wait, yeah you did that, never mind.
 
I got it!
Instead of converting M vectors into g forces of x and y, why don't you convert the other 2 m mass into direction of M which is Gm/l^2 * cos(45) * 2.
Then add it to the g force of M
My answer is (1.41Gm + 0.5GM)/l^2.
Hope it helps, the post was like half a month ago, lol.
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top