Shaw
- 46
- 3
In the absence of a sense of scale, will the gravitational fields of large objects be indistinguishable, one from the other?
Shaw said:In the absence of a sense of scale, will the gravitational fields of large objects be indistinguishable, one from the other?
In the absence of a sense of time, it would take the same time.Shaw said:Can we therefore conclude that the amount of time needed for a test object (suitable to the size of the object) to fall through a gravitational field will be the same?
A test object in a weak gravitational field will fall through the field to the Schwarzschild radius more slowly than a test object in a strong field, but an object in a strong field has further to fall. Intuitively, I think that it's a wash, and all appropriate test objects in all fields will take the same amount of time to reach the Schwarzschild radius. They all arrive at the radius at the same time.SlowThinker said:In the absence of a sense of time, it would take the same time.
But I'm not sure I follow your logic.
A gravitational field has no end. If you fall from a given distance, then a heavier object will attract you faster, and you'll have (a bit) shorter distance to fall.Shaw said:A test object in a weak gravitational field will fall through the field to the Schwarzschild radius more slowly than a test object in a strong field, but an object in a strong field has further to fall. Intuitively, I think that it's a wash, and all appropriate test objects in all fields will take the same amount of time to reach the Schwarzschild radius. They all arrive at the radius at the same time.