Gravitational force on objects

Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around the gravitational force acting on objects of different masses, specifically a feather and a rock, when dropped simultaneously. Participants explore the implications of gravitational acceleration, air resistance, and energy conservation in the context of free fall, addressing both theoretical and practical aspects of the phenomenon.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory
  • Technical explanation
  • Conceptual clarification
  • Debate/contested

Main Points Raised

  • One participant asserts that the rock hits the ground first due to experiencing a larger gravitational force, questioning how this relates to the velocity equations for both objects.
  • Another participant counters that the difference in fall times is primarily due to air resistance, stating that if air resistance were removed, both objects would fall at the same rate.
  • A subsequent reply acknowledges that the velocity equations apply only in the absence of air resistance.
  • One participant introduces the concept of energy conservation, presenting equations that show the velocity of impact is independent of mass when air resistance is negligible.
  • Another participant confirms that both v = gt and v = √(2gh) can be used to determine impact velocity, depending on the context.
  • A later contribution emphasizes that the mass of falling objects does not affect their acceleration, referencing Newton's second law and the equivalence principle to support this claim.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants generally agree that gravitational acceleration is the same for all objects in free fall, but there is disagreement regarding the role of air resistance and how it affects the observed behavior of the feather and rock. The discussion remains unresolved regarding the implications of these factors on the equations used to describe their motion.

Contextual Notes

The discussion includes assumptions about the presence or absence of air resistance and the conditions under which the equations apply. There are also references to energy conservation that may depend on specific scenarios not fully explored in the conversation.

CAF123
Gold Member
Messages
2,918
Reaction score
87
If I take a feather and a rock and drop them at the same time, because of the effect of the gravitational force, we know that the rock will hit the ground first. (The rock experiences a larger gravitational force).

My question is if these objects are dropped at the same time and vertically, then the velocity can be described as [itex]v = gt[/itex], for both objects. Therefore, at [itex]t = 1, v = 9.81 m s^{-1}[/itex] and at [itex]t = 2, v = 19.6 m s^{-1}[/itex]. However, i find it difficult to believe the feather will have this velocity. So how does the differences in gravitational force be accounted for in this equation?

Many thanks
 
Physics news on Phys.org
CAF123 said:
If I take a feather and a rock and drop them at the same time, because of the effect of the gravitational force, we know that the rock will hit the ground first. (The rock experiences a larger gravitational force).
The reason that the rock hits first is not because of its greater gravitational force. If only gravity acted, then both would have the same acceleration = g. But other forces are involved, in particular air resistance. Take away the air and the feather and rock will fall together.
 
I see, many thanks.
So essentially the formula only works when considering zero air resistance
 
yes and no...

Just before an object is dropped it has some energy let's call it Estart where

Estart = PEstart + KEstart

Since it's stationary KEstart = 0 so

Estart = PEstart = mgh

When it hits the ground it has some energy, let's call it Eend then

Eend = PEend + KEend

but PEend = 0 so

Eend = KEend = 0.5mv2

If we assume there is no air resistance to be overcome (or any other way for energy to leave the system) then the law of Conservation of Energy says

Estart = Eend

or

mgh = 0.5mv2

Notice how the mass cancels and the velocity of impact is independent of mass

v = SQRT(2gh)
 
Last edited:
And if it takes [itex]t[/itex] seconds to cover this distance [itex]h[/itex], either [itex]v = gt[/itex] or [itex]v = \sqrt{2gh}[/itex] can be used to determine this impact velocity, I presume?
 
CAF123 said:
[itex]v = \sqrt{2gh}[/itex] can be used to determine this impact velocity, I presume?

That's what i said.
 
you have two objects of mass M and m, with M>m .
if you let them fall, you get from Newton's 2nd law:
M a1= - M g
m a2= - m g
from that you see immediately that a1=a2
which means the speed of the mass M will change by the same amount in the same time interval as will the speed of mass m.

The mass of the falling object, does not appear in your motion equations. It doesn't affect it.
Even if I didn't use the "static model", that the grav force is mg, but used the force:
F= G M' m /r (M':Earth's Mass)
the masses of the falling objects would again drop out.
Of course that is not obvious, it comes thanks to the equivalence principle, which says that the mass that appears in ma, and the mass that appears in m* (GM'/r) is the same
m=m*
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
1K
  • · Replies 29 ·
Replies
29
Views
4K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
5K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
3K
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
3K
  • · Replies 41 ·
2
Replies
41
Views
8K
  • · Replies 16 ·
Replies
16
Views
3K
  • · Replies 41 ·
2
Replies
41
Views
4K