Gravitational Forces between three stars

AI Thread Summary
The problem involves three stars, each with the mass and radius of the sun, forming an equilateral triangle and released from rest. The gravitational force equation is applied, but confusion arises regarding the uniformity of acceleration as the stars move toward each other. The discussion suggests using conservation of energy to relate gravitational potential energy to kinetic energy for accurate calculations. The gravitational potential energy is calculated using the distance between the stars, and the goal is to find the final speed as they collide at the center. The expected answer is 3.71*10^5 m/s, highlighting the need for careful consideration of gravitational interactions during the stars' acceleration.
NivekOh
Messages
3
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


Three stars, each with the mass and radius of our sun, form an equilateral triangle 5.0*10^9m on a side. If all three are simultaneously released from rest, what are their speeds as they crash together in the center?

Homework Equations


Fg= GMm/r^2


The Attempt at a Solution


It says the three stars are released from rest and start accelerating towards each other, so I'm assuming there is no centripetal acceleration (?). So I set 2Fgcos30 equal to ma and solved for a, which equals 9.2. Then I plugged it into the v = (2as)^(1/2) formula with s=2.89*10^9m being the midpoint of the circle using trig. I can't figure out what I'm doing wrong.

The given answer in the book is 3.71*10^5m/s
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Is the acceleration uniform?
 
I'm not sure, but if it wasn't.. you would have to account for stuff I feel like is impossible, like accounting for the increase in gravitational forces as the stars accelerate towards each other...
 
That is what you need to do. I wouldn't say it is impossible, just needs a little more thought.
 
To solve this problem, you need to start out with the basic equation of conservation of energy, as this is an energy problem.So the gravitational potential energy equation is given by Ue = G M1*M2/R

Kinetic energy is K = 1/2 M V^2

We need to calculate the gravitational potential energy for one of the masses, since the equations of motion for one of them is the same for the other two.

So since G is just the constant, leave it be...M1 can be equated as the other two masses, so 2*mass of sun, then M2 is the mass of the current sun at hand, so M1 = mass of sun. R is going to be the Rcos30 value as we are only concerned with that particular component.

So once you calculate your gravitational potential energy...I got something around 1.22*10^41 or so...there is a negative sign as it indicates direction. Then set that equal to the kinetic energy, 1/2mV^2, and solve for V.
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...

Similar threads

Replies
7
Views
2K
Replies
6
Views
2K
Replies
11
Views
3K
Replies
14
Views
4K
Replies
11
Views
2K
Replies
2
Views
1K
Back
Top