Gravitational Potential Energy, Elastic Potential Energy, and Kinetic Energy

AI Thread Summary
A 4.0 kg mass compresses a vertical spring with a spring constant of 400 N/m by 0.250 m. The kinetic energy of the mass when it leaves the spring is calculated using the conservation of energy equation. The discussion clarifies that the displacement in the spring (Δx) and the change in height (Δh) are equivalent in this scenario. This relationship simplifies the calculations, confirming that the vertical nature of the spring does not alter the energy conservation principles. Understanding this relationship is crucial for solving problems involving gravitational and elastic potential energy.
PeachBanana
Messages
189
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



A 4.0 kg mass is pressed down on a vertical spring of spring constant 400 N/m, compressing it to 0.250 m. After it is released, the amount of kinetic energy this mass would have when it leaves the spring is ___.

Homework Equations



mgy(final) + 1/2 kx^2 (final) + 1/2 mv^2 (final) = mgy (initial) + 1/2kx^2 (initial) + 1/2 mv^2 (initial)

The Attempt at a Solution



Ok so I think what I'm solving for is 1/2 mv^2 (final)

(4.0 kg)(9.8m/s^2)(0m) + 1/2 (400 N/m)(0m)^2 + 1/2(4.0 kg)(v)^2 = (4.0 kg)(9.8 m/s^2)(-0.250 m) + 1/2(400 N/m)(-0.250m)^2 + 1/2(4.0 kg)(0 m/s)^2

That was sort of long so to simplify it a bit:

1/2(4.0 kg)(v)^2 = (4.0 kg)(9.8m/s^2)(-.250m) + 1/2(400 N/m)(-0.250m)^2 + 1/2(4.0 kg)(0 m/s)^2

My main concern: My "x" and "y" are the same. Is that because it's a vertical spring? I'm calling the end of the release x=0 m and y=0 m and the compression -0.250 m.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
you have done it all correctly. Technically speaking, x is the displacement from the equilibrium point. So you can think of it as Δx = x2-x1, where the x1 is the equilibrium point. We also know that the displacement Δx is purely vertical, so what is the (nice and simple) relationship between Δx and Δh?
 
Ok, so Δx and Δh in this case are the same; that makes sense.
 
yep, that's right. Often you'll find that its the change in height that is important in questions with uniform gravity.
 
Thread 'Collision of a bullet on a rod-string system: query'
In this question, I have a question. I am NOT trying to solve it, but it is just a conceptual question. Consider the point on the rod, which connects the string and the rod. My question: just before and after the collision, is ANGULAR momentum CONSERVED about this point? Lets call the point which connects the string and rod as P. Why am I asking this? : it is clear from the scenario that the point of concern, which connects the string and the rod, moves in a circular path due to the string...
Back
Top