Gravitational Potential Energy of a projectile

AI Thread Summary
A projectile shot directly away from Earth's surface reaches a radial distance of 0.125 times Earth's radius when its initial speed is one-third of the escape speed. For a projectile with initial kinetic energy equal to two-fifths of the escape energy, the radial distance achieved is 0.670 times Earth's radius. The calculations involve using gravitational potential energy and kinetic energy equations, where mass cancels out. There is confusion regarding whether the height should be counted from the Earth's center, suggesting a potential adjustment to the final distances. The discussion highlights the importance of correctly interpreting the reference point for height in gravitational calculations.
lu6cifer
Messages
16
Reaction score
0
A projectile is shot directly away from Earth's surface. Neglect the rotation of Earth.

(a) As a multiple of Earth's radius RE, what is the radial distance a projectile reaches if its initial speed is one-third of the escape speed from Earth?

(b) As a multiple of Earth's radius RE, what is the radial distance a projectile reaches if its initial kinetic energy is two-fifths of the kinetic energy required to escape Earth





U = -GMm/r
K = 1/2mv^2
Radius of Earth = 6.38e6
Mass of Earth = 5.98e24




(a) Escape speed of Earth = 11.2 km/s
=11200 m/s

U1 + K1 = U2
-GMm/r + 1/2mv^2 = -GMm/(r+h)

m cancels out
11200/3 = 3733

(-6.67e-11 * 5.98e24) / 6.38e6 + 1/2 * 3733^2 = (-6.67e-11 * 5.98e24) / (6.38e6 + h)
-55550537.32 = -3.98866e14 / (6.38e6 + h)
h = 800236.5781

h / Re = 800236.5781 / 6.38e6 = 0.125 times the radius of the earth

(b)
U1 + K1 = U2
-GMm/r + 1/2mv^2 = -GMm/(r+h)

but it asks for 2/5 the KE, so

-GMm/r + (2/5)1/2mv^2 = -GMm/(r+h)
m cancels out

-GM/r + 1/5 v^2 = -GM / (r+h)
Plugged in the same numbers as part (a), except for v, which is 11200 m/s

I got h, divided by Radius of Earth (6.38e6) and get 0.670 times radius of earth


Did I make any mistakes? Because the answers are wrong, apparently
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Well, at least the eq looks right for me. The only thing I could think of, is that h is counted also from the center of earth. So instead of .125, h is 1.125?
 
Thread 'Collision of a bullet on a rod-string system: query'
In this question, I have a question. I am NOT trying to solve it, but it is just a conceptual question. Consider the point on the rod, which connects the string and the rod. My question: just before and after the collision, is ANGULAR momentum CONSERVED about this point? Lets call the point which connects the string and rod as P. Why am I asking this? : it is clear from the scenario that the point of concern, which connects the string and the rod, moves in a circular path due to the string...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanged mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top