Gravitational Potential Energy of an object

AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on calculating the gravitational potential energy of a 1000 kg object influenced by a large uniform ring with a mass of 2.36x10^20 kg and a radius of 1.00x10^8 m. The initial potential energy was incorrectly calculated using the distance from the center of the ring instead of the distance to the ring's mass. Correcting this involves treating the scenario as a right triangle to find the appropriate distance. After adjusting the calculations, the correct potential energy values can be derived. The conversation highlights the importance of accurately determining distances in gravitational calculations.
mickellowery
Messages
69
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


Consider a large uniform ring having a mass of 2.36x1020kg and a radius 1.00x108m. An object with a mass of 1000kg is placed at a point 2.00x108m from the center of the ring. When the object is released, the attraction of the ring makes the object move along a straight line toward the center of the ring. Calculate the gravitational potential energy of the object-ring system when the object is at the starting point, and then calculate the potential energy at the ending point. Calculate the object's speed as it passes through B.


Homework Equations


U= -Gm1m2/r


The Attempt at a Solution


I used this equation for the initial condition with G=6.673x10-11 m1=2.36x1020 m2=1000 and r=2.00x108. The answer I got was -7.87x104. The book says that the answer is -7.04x104, I am assuming that I need to factor in the radius of the ring somehow but I don't know how I should work it into the equation.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
You're using the wrong distance. You need the distance between the object and the ring (where the mass is), not between the object and the center of the ring.
 
Aaaahh I see, treat it like a right triangle and then use this equation. You've saved my sanity one more time Doc. Thanks so much.
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top