Gravitational Wave: Does Vibrating Mass Emit Waves?

  • Thread starter Thread starter Ahmed Abdullah
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Wave
Ahmed Abdullah
Messages
203
Reaction score
3
Vibrating charges emits electromagnetic waves. Does any vibrating mass is capable of producing wave (that can be called graviational wave)?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Theory says, yes... it has not yet been observed experimentally.
 
There are experiments going on at the moment - pointing michelson-morley style interferometers at supernovae and trying to detect the spacetime distortions (supposedly) given off. Because the gravitational force is actually incredibly weak, these are very difficult to see - hence the supernova-as-a-subject requirement; nothing else is powerful enough.
 
Gravitational waves are incredibly weak (OOM 10-40 em waves) and might be detectable but only from the strongest gravitational fields.

Note that if the system retains spherical symmetry, such as in a Cepheid Variable star that oscillates in diameter, or a supernova that explodes more or less symmetrically, gravitational waves are not produced.

Systems that should produce detectable gravitational waves are closely orbiting pulsars PSR J0737-3039A/B and colliding neutron stars/black holes such as those that are thought to be a possible source of short GRBs. As Integral said none have yet been detected.

Garth
 
Last edited:
This is quite an exciting field: If astronomical source estimates are correct, LIGO is now approaching the sensitivity where there is a real chance of them making a detection anytime in the next "year or several" -- and whenever LISA launches, it should be swamped with signal (interferometers work like omnidirectional microphones). With any luck there will exist a completely new branch of astronomy within a couple decades.
 
I started reading a National Geographic article related to the Big Bang. It starts these statements: Gazing up at the stars at night, it’s easy to imagine that space goes on forever. But cosmologists know that the universe actually has limits. First, their best models indicate that space and time had a beginning, a subatomic point called a singularity. This point of intense heat and density rapidly ballooned outward. My first reaction was that this is a layman's approximation to...
Thread 'Dirac's integral for the energy-momentum of the gravitational field'
See Dirac's brief treatment of the energy-momentum pseudo-tensor in the attached picture. Dirac is presumably integrating eq. (31.2) over the 4D "hypercylinder" defined by ##T_1 \le x^0 \le T_2## and ##\mathbf{|x|} \le R##, where ##R## is sufficiently large to include all the matter-energy fields in the system. Then \begin{align} 0 &= \int_V \left[ ({t_\mu}^\nu + T_\mu^\nu)\sqrt{-g}\, \right]_{,\nu} d^4 x = \int_{\partial V} ({t_\mu}^\nu + T_\mu^\nu)\sqrt{-g} \, dS_\nu \nonumber\\ &= \left(...
In Philippe G. Ciarlet's book 'An introduction to differential geometry', He gives the integrability conditions of the differential equations like this: $$ \partial_{i} F_{lj}=L^p_{ij} F_{lp},\,\,\,F_{ij}(x_0)=F^0_{ij}. $$ The integrability conditions for the existence of a global solution ##F_{lj}## is: $$ R^i_{jkl}\equiv\partial_k L^i_{jl}-\partial_l L^i_{jk}+L^h_{jl} L^i_{hk}-L^h_{jk} L^i_{hl}=0 $$ Then from the equation: $$\nabla_b e_a= \Gamma^c_{ab} e_c$$ Using cartesian basis ## e_I...
Back
Top