B Gravitational Waves: Prevalence Across the Universe

roineust
Messages
341
Reaction score
9
Would it be correct to say, that gravitational waves of the magnitude that is currently detected by LIGO and similar detectors, are prevalent to the extent that there is no single location in the known universe, that such magnitude of gravitational waves, don't pass through at least several times a year?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
How would we know one way or the other?
 
  • Like
Likes roineust
roineust said:
Would it be correct to say, that gravitational waves of the magnitude that is currently detected by LIGO and similar detectors, are prevalent to the extent that there is no single location in the known universe, that such magnitude of gravitational waves, don't pass through at least several times a year?
We are a single point in the Universe. How many events per year does LIGO report with high confidence?
 
  • Like
Likes roineust
LIGO lists its detections by year
https://www.ligo.caltech.edu/page/detection-companion-papers

https://www.ligo.caltech.edu/page/faq
"On average, over its first two observing runs, LIGO's detections have been made at a rate of one every 2 months, and this is before we reach so-called "design sensitivity" (which we expect to reach in 2020). The eleven confirmed detections made so far suggest that these kinds of events are relatively common. Once LIGO's detectors reach their maximum sensitivity, they could be detecting gravitational waves at a rate of one per week. The only way to refine the estimates of how often detectable gravitational waves pass, is to keep making detections! "
 
  • Like
Likes berkeman, vanhees71 and roineust
More importantly, all known Ligo detections appear to come from distant extragalactic sources (like gamma ray bursts).
Since gravitational waves are not heavily attenuated either by distance or by passing through galaxies, only by inverse square spreading, we can guess that an observer in our general vicinity, but in an intergalactic void, would still see roughly the same number of gravitational wave events.
With just 11 confirmed detections, there is no statistical evidence for concentration in Milky Way disc or away from it, and no such concentration is expected.
Note that if most observed gravitational waves came from Milky Way, observers in intergalactic space would see less. But as stated, this is not the case.
 
  • Like
Likes vanhees71, roineust and atyy
Thread 'Can this experiment break Lorentz symmetry?'
1. The Big Idea: According to Einstein’s relativity, all motion is relative. You can’t tell if you’re moving at a constant velocity without looking outside. But what if there is a universal “rest frame” (like the old idea of the “ether”)? This experiment tries to find out by looking for tiny, directional differences in how objects move inside a sealed box. 2. How It Works: The Two-Stage Process Imagine a perfectly isolated spacecraft (our lab) moving through space at some unknown speed V...
Does the speed of light change in a gravitational field depending on whether the direction of travel is parallel to the field, or perpendicular to the field? And is it the same in both directions at each orientation? This question could be answered experimentally to some degree of accuracy. Experiment design: Place two identical clocks A and B on the circumference of a wheel at opposite ends of the diameter of length L. The wheel is positioned upright, i.e., perpendicular to the ground...
According to the General Theory of Relativity, time does not pass on a black hole, which means that processes they don't work either. As the object becomes heavier, the speed of matter falling on it for an observer on Earth will first increase, and then slow down, due to the effect of time dilation. And then it will stop altogether. As a result, we will not get a black hole, since the critical mass will not be reached. Although the object will continue to attract matter, it will not be a...
Back
Top