A Gravitational Waves: Verification Accuracy & Physicists' Opinions

arupel
Messages
45
Reaction score
2
From what I understand the LIGO experiments were the first in the road to demonstrating the existence of gravitational waves. There was a dicussion about this on Utube where someone pointed out that the polarized light scattered from dust, being much larger, could mask the the effect of gravitational waves.

Since the LIGO experiments are measurements of something almost impossibly small, what is the current opinion among physicists about the verification of gravitation waves?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
You're conflating two different observations. There was a report from an experiment called BICEP, which had claimed to see the indirect signal due to gravitational waves in the very early universe. It's now agreed by most scientists that these observations were more likely due to polarization due to dust in our galaxy, so people are still searching for these "B-mode" signals that would indicate the presence of gravitational waves in the early universe.

This is very different from the LIGO experiment, which measured the gravitational waves directly from black hole - black hole mergers, and more recently a neutron star - neutron star merger. I think, since these gravitational waves have been seen by both LIGO observatories in the US, and by the Virgo observatory in Europe, that most scientists would agree that we are really measuring gravitational waves.
 
  • Like
Likes Daverz, Orodruin and PeterDonis
Thread 'Can this experiment break Lorentz symmetry?'
1. The Big Idea: According to Einstein’s relativity, all motion is relative. You can’t tell if you’re moving at a constant velocity without looking outside. But what if there is a universal “rest frame” (like the old idea of the “ether”)? This experiment tries to find out by looking for tiny, directional differences in how objects move inside a sealed box. 2. How It Works: The Two-Stage Process Imagine a perfectly isolated spacecraft (our lab) moving through space at some unknown speed V...
Does the speed of light change in a gravitational field depending on whether the direction of travel is parallel to the field, or perpendicular to the field? And is it the same in both directions at each orientation? This question could be answered experimentally to some degree of accuracy. Experiment design: Place two identical clocks A and B on the circumference of a wheel at opposite ends of the diameter of length L. The wheel is positioned upright, i.e., perpendicular to the ground...
According to the General Theory of Relativity, time does not pass on a black hole, which means that processes they don't work either. As the object becomes heavier, the speed of matter falling on it for an observer on Earth will first increase, and then slow down, due to the effect of time dilation. And then it will stop altogether. As a result, we will not get a black hole, since the critical mass will not be reached. Although the object will continue to attract matter, it will not be a...

Similar threads

Replies
14
Views
1K
Replies
4
Views
2K
Replies
4
Views
939
Replies
7
Views
2K
Replies
2
Views
1K
Replies
11
Views
4K
Back
Top