Understanding Gravitons: A Key to Quantum Gravity?

  • Thread starter Thread starter MarcusH
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Bosons Gravitons
AI Thread Summary
Gravitons are theorized particles that would carry the force of gravity, but they have not yet been detected, making gravity unique among fundamental forces. While other forces have measurable bosons, gravity's weak nature complicates experimental detection. Current research, including efforts at LIGO, aims to explore gravitational waves, which may provide insights into quantum gravity. Understanding the distinction between fermions and bosons, where fermions are associated with mass and bosons with forces, is essential. Further literature on quantum gravity can enhance comprehension of these complex concepts.
MarcusH
Messages
1
Reaction score
0
Hello,

I am about as far from a physicist as physically possible, but I am fascinated by the theory, so I've re-enrolled in some intro physics classes next semester. (I'm a Poli Sci/Pre-Law Undergrad).

I've been reading a bit about the subject for some time now, and I'm a little confused regarding the Bosons that carry the force of gravity (gravitons?). I understand that photons carry radiation, W and Z bosons carry the weak bond and gluons carry the force that bind protons and neutrons to form nuclei. I am not quite grasping how gravity, the most evident force that exists, is not measurable by particles that carry the force of gravity.

Can anyone direct me to literature that will explain it, so that those of us non-grad students (yet!) can grasp the concept?

Thanks in advance,

Marcus Hodgkins
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
One of the places where you could get more information is Wikipedia. Search on the terms, Fermion, Boson, and Graviton. There you will find that bosons have integer spin, while fermions have half integer spin. Fermions are associated with mass, while bosons are associated with forces. Gravitons have spin 2, and are assumed to be massless. I'm sure you can connect the dots...
 
Hi Marcus. About gravitons, it's not that gravity has no carrier particle. It's just that we have, as of yet, been unable to detect the graviton. The theory exists, and we can even predict the spin. But doing experiments with gravity is very difficult. It's a very weak force, as evidenced by the fact that it takes an object the size of a planet just to create a noticeable gravitational force, whereas a small plastic rod with an electric charge can do the same thing. Experiments are underway right now to detect phenomena like gravitational waves, but have yet to gather any meaningful data (at least that's what my friend at LIGO tells me). All of this is actually related to the problem of formulating a quantum theory of gravity, in which the gravitational field is quantized like the other fundamental forces of nature.

If you dare, you might try Googling "quantum gravity," and see what you find. If I think of any books on the subject for laypeople, I'll be sure to send you a link too.
 
Thread 'Gauss' law seems to imply instantaneous electric field'
Imagine a charged sphere at the origin connected through an open switch to a vertical grounded wire. We wish to find an expression for the horizontal component of the electric field at a distance ##\mathbf{r}## from the sphere as it discharges. By using the Lorenz gauge condition: $$\nabla \cdot \mathbf{A} + \frac{1}{c^2}\frac{\partial \phi}{\partial t}=0\tag{1}$$ we find the following retarded solutions to the Maxwell equations If we assume that...
I passed a motorcycle on the highway going the opposite direction. I know I was doing 125/km/h. I estimated that the frequency of his motor dropped by an entire octave, so that's a doubling of the wavelength. My intuition is telling me that's extremely unlikely. I can't actually calculate how fast he was going with just that information, can I? It seems to me, I have to know the absolute frequency of one of those tones, either shifted up or down or unshifted, yes? I tried to mimic the...
Back
Top