Gravitons vs Relativity: Einstein or Particle Exchange?

QUANTUMQ
Messages
8
Reaction score
0
does the idea of how gravity works through gravitons contradict einsteins general relativity?
the idea of a particle exchange (gravitons) does don't seem to agree with space-time fabric.
can they agree or is only one right? if so which do you think?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
I can tell you that you can find Einstein's equations starting from the hypothesis of a massless spin-2 exchange. But I agree that, apart from being spin-2, we don't know much how the graviton should be defined. The obvious idea is g=\eta+h where g is the metric, \eta is the metric of the vacuum, and h is your graviton field. This idea does not allow you to couple fermions to the graviton. Sometimes we take the vierbein, which is "roughly speaking" the square root of the metric, to be related more directly to the graviton field.
 
I seem to notice a buildup of papers like this: Detecting single gravitons with quantum sensing. (OK, old one.) Toward graviton detection via photon-graviton quantum state conversion Is this akin to “we’re soon gonna put string theory to the test”, or are these legit? Mind, I’m not expecting anyone to read the papers and explain them to me, but if one of you educated people already have an opinion I’d like to hear it. If not please ignore me. EDIT: I strongly suspect it’s bunk but...
I'm trying to understand the relationship between the Higgs mechanism and the concept of inertia. The Higgs field gives fundamental particles their rest mass, but it doesn't seem to directly explain why a massive object resists acceleration (inertia). My question is: How does the Standard Model account for inertia? Is it simply taken as a given property of mass, or is there a deeper connection to the vacuum structure? Furthermore, how does the Higgs mechanism relate to broader concepts like...
Back
Top