Gravity Acceleration through a Hole in Earth

CutterMcCool
Messages
7
Reaction score
0
Consider this a thought experiment.

Suppose the Earth had a stable hole through it to its center wide enough to drop a golf ball down. Assuming that golf ball freefalls (no friction with hole wall), would its acceleration rate continually increase as it fell to the center? If it increases, at what distance from the center (if any) would the golf ball reach the speed of light?

Since g=GM/R^2, as the golf ball falls closer to the Earth's center, R shortens and acceleration increases--unless the effective mass of earth, M, also decreases as the golf ball approaches the center.

A correlated question: would any particle close enough to the center of the Earth to be within its Schwarzschild radius (about 8.8 millimeters) be unable to leave that radius because its escape velocity would be greater than the speed of light?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
CutterMcCool said:
Suppose the Earth had a stable hole through it to its center wide enough to drop a golf ball down. Assuming that golf ball freefalls (no friction with hole wall), would its acceleration rate continually increase as it fell to the center?
No.

Since g=GM/R^2, as the golf ball falls closer to the Earth's center, R shortens and acceleration increases--unless the effective mass of earth, M, also decreases as the golf ball approaches the center.
When you are a distance r from the center, only that part of the Earth's mass that is < r from the center contributes to the gravitational acceleration at that point. (Making the simplifying assumption of spherical symmetry.) If you further assume the Earth to be of uniform density, then the acceleration due to gravity will vary linearly from zero at the center to the maximum at the Earth's surface.

A correlated question: would any particle close enough to the center of the Earth to be within its Schwarzschild radius (about 8.8 millimeters) be unable to leave that radius because its escape velocity would be greater than the speed of light?
No.
 
I started reading a National Geographic article related to the Big Bang. It starts these statements: Gazing up at the stars at night, it’s easy to imagine that space goes on forever. But cosmologists know that the universe actually has limits. First, their best models indicate that space and time had a beginning, a subatomic point called a singularity. This point of intense heat and density rapidly ballooned outward. My first reaction was that this is a layman's approximation to...
Thread 'Dirac's integral for the energy-momentum of the gravitational field'
See Dirac's brief treatment of the energy-momentum pseudo-tensor in the attached picture. Dirac is presumably integrating eq. (31.2) over the 4D "hypercylinder" defined by ##T_1 \le x^0 \le T_2## and ##\mathbf{|x|} \le R##, where ##R## is sufficiently large to include all the matter-energy fields in the system. Then \begin{align} 0 &= \int_V \left[ ({t_\mu}^\nu + T_\mu^\nu)\sqrt{-g}\, \right]_{,\nu} d^4 x = \int_{\partial V} ({t_\mu}^\nu + T_\mu^\nu)\sqrt{-g} \, dS_\nu \nonumber\\ &= \left(...
In Philippe G. Ciarlet's book 'An introduction to differential geometry', He gives the integrability conditions of the differential equations like this: $$ \partial_{i} F_{lj}=L^p_{ij} F_{lp},\,\,\,F_{ij}(x_0)=F^0_{ij}. $$ The integrability conditions for the existence of a global solution ##F_{lj}## is: $$ R^i_{jkl}\equiv\partial_k L^i_{jl}-\partial_l L^i_{jk}+L^h_{jl} L^i_{hk}-L^h_{jk} L^i_{hl}=0 $$ Then from the equation: $$\nabla_b e_a= \Gamma^c_{ab} e_c$$ Using cartesian basis ## e_I...

Similar threads

Back
Top