Gravity Field Measurment / Refresh Rate of Sensors

AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on the variability of Earth's gravitational field and the limitations of satellite sensors in measuring these changes. It highlights that gravity is not constant due to factors like ocean tides, weather, and seismic events, which can alter the gravitational field. The Gravity Recovery and Climate Experiment (GRACE) satellites and the Gravity field and steady-state Ocean Circulation Explorer (GOCE) are mentioned as tools that detect gravitational changes through precise measurements of satellite distances rather than direct gravity sensing. The conversation also clarifies that gravity sensors do not exist; instead, accelerometers measure gravitational gradients to create gravity models. Overall, the thread emphasizes the complexity of measuring gravitational variations and the computational effort required to analyze the data.
philipp2020
Messages
34
Reaction score
0
Hi

Reading another post about the inverse square law by trewsx7 on this forum, I had the idea that maybe the gravity field isn't constant at some parts.

Imaging a 2-dimensional gravity field produced by a source. Considering ∏, there might be a repeating infinitesimal patterns on ∏ where gravity isn't behaving as it normaly does. I was thinking that the gravity sensors on board of satellites have a refresh rate which is too low to measure this effect, as they are moving too fast at the same time.

So I was interested in finding out what kind of refresh rate the sensors on gravity satellite have, but couldn't find anything. Maybe someone here knows?

Regards

Philipp
 
Physics news on Phys.org
philipp, I'm a bit leery of responding to your post. We do not tolerate personal theories at this site, and this sure looks like one. I'm closing the thread, pending moderation, with this post.That said, Earth's gravitational field does vary with time. The ocean tides and Earth tides change the shape of the Earth and hence of it's gravitational field. So does weather; a very detailed gravity model may even need to account for things such as the winter snow load on Siberia.

Even earthquakes reshape the Earth's gravity field. The Gravity Recovery and Climate Experiment (GRACE) satellites sensed the gravitational changes that resulted from the 2004 Sumatra, 2010 Chile, and 2011 Japan earthquakes. The final one, the 2011 Japan earthquake, was also sensed by the Gravity field and steady-state Ocean Circulation Explorer (GOCE) satellite. These changes were detected after the fact by analyzing before and after gravity models. GOCE also "sensed" the Japan earthquake in a quite different way. The propagating earthquake created sound waves, and GOCE sensed those.

There is no such thing as a "gravity sensor". The gravitational force itself is unmeasurable. The GRACE satellites measured the distance between the two satellites in the cluster. When the satellites went one by one over a gravitational anomaly (e.g., a mountain), the distance between the satellites changed by a tiny bit. The GRACE gravity models are generated by knowing the satellites' orbits to a high degree of precision and by knowing the relative distance to an even higher degree of precision. No gravity sensors are needed.

GOCE uses accelerometers configured as gravity gradiometer. While accelerometers do not measure gravity (nothing can), a suite of accelerometers attached to a rigid body can measure the gradient in the gravitational acceleration field. Once again, the gravity field itself can only be recovered with knowledge of the orbit. The accelerometer data enables creation of a high precision gravity model. This is all done after the fact, on the ground. Generating those gravity models requires a lot of computation.
 
Last edited:
Thread 'Question about pressure of a liquid'
I am looking at pressure in liquids and I am testing my idea. The vertical tube is 100m, the contraption is filled with water. The vertical tube is very thin(maybe 1mm^2 cross section). The area of the base is ~100m^2. Will he top half be launched in the air if suddenly it cracked?- assuming its light enough. I want to test my idea that if I had a thin long ruber tube that I lifted up, then the pressure at "red lines" will be high and that the $force = pressure * area$ would be massive...
I feel it should be solvable we just need to find a perfect pattern, and there will be a general pattern since the forces acting are based on a single function, so..... you can't actually say it is unsolvable right? Cause imaging 3 bodies actually existed somwhere in this universe then nature isn't gonna wait till we predict it! And yea I have checked in many places that tiny changes cause large changes so it becomes chaos........ but still I just can't accept that it is impossible to solve...
Back
Top