Gravity, heat, flooding, and centrifugal force on a tidal-locked planet

AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on the physics of a tidal-locked planet in a science fiction context. Increasing the planet's rotation would strengthen centrifugal force, which could reduce effective gravity on the surface, particularly at the equator, while having minimal impact at the poles. The Coriolis effect alters air circulation patterns but does not directly influence heat transfer, which occurs through convection. To accelerate icecap melting and flooding, ecological terrorists could manipulate heat distribution and airflow patterns, leveraging the new rotational dynamics. Overall, the interplay of rotation, gravity, and atmospheric effects is crucial for the narrative's ecological themes.
Mark Everglade
Messages
3
Reaction score
1
Hi. I'm a science fiction author whose first novel Hemispheres, published through RockHill Publishing, explored a tidal-locked planet (Gliese 581g) where a group of activists increased its rotation to bring daylight cycles to both hemispheres. Now I'm writing the sequel, and there's ecological terrorist acts going on (I can explain why but it's not relevant to the physics questions).

Question 1) One group is trying to increase the planet's rotation even faster. Since centrifugal force would be stronger, would this indirectly increase the effects of gravity on the planet (gravity growing stronger as the planet spins faster)?

Question 2) One group of ecological terrorists are attempting to speed the melting of the icecaps. Since the planet is no longer tidal locked, the Coriolis effect exists now and that, in addition to daylight cycles, creates heat and heat transfer that melts the icecaps causing flooding. How would a nefarious group increase the speed of this flooding taking place?

Thanks!

Mark
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Mark Everglade said:
Question 1) One group is trying to increase the planet's rotation even faster. Since centrifugal force would be stronger, would this indirectly increase the effects of gravity on the planet (gravity growing stronger as the planet spins faster)?
The Earth's rotation decreases the effective gravity.
 
To add to what @PeroK posted. the centrifugal effect acts outward from the axis of rotation. And gets stronger as you move away from the axis. Thus this effective weakening is zero at the poles, and increases as you move towards the equator. But it is a small effect for something the size of the Earth rotating once every 24 hrs.

As far as Coriolis effect goes. The transfer of heat from equator to poles does not rely on it. This is done by simple convection. Air is heated at the equator, rises and moves towards the poles were it cools, sinks and then moves back towards the equator. You get air circulation of warm air moving towards the Poles in the upper atmosphere and cold air moving away from the Poles at ground level. What the Coriolis effect does is change the pattern of this circulation so that it is no longer along a straight North-South line.
 
  • Like
Likes Mark Everglade and PeroK
Mark Everglade said:
Since centrifugal force would be stronger, would this indirectly increase the effects of gravity on the planet (gravity growing stronger as the planet spins faster)?

That depends on what you mean with "the effects of gravity on the planet". Do you mean gravitational forces of the star acting on the planet or gravitational forces of the planet acting on something else that is located on the planet? For the second case it has already been mentioned that the gravity on the surface of the planet will be reduced at most places. It can (but don't need to) be increased on the poles (depending on the size of the core). For the first case you need to distinguish between the gravitational net force (which will be almosty unchanged) and the tidal forces (which will be increased around the aequator).
 
Janus said:
To add to what @PeroK posted. the centrifugal effect acts outward from the axis of rotation. And gets stronger as you move away from the axis. Thus this effective weakening is zero at the poles, and increases as you move towards the equator. But it is a small effect for something the size of the Earth rotating once every 24 hrs.

As far as Coriolis effect goes. The transfer of heat from equator to poles does not rely on it. This is done by simple convection. Air is heated at the equator, rises and moves towards the poles were it cools, sinks and then moves back towards the equator. You get air circulation of warm air moving towards the Poles in the upper atmosphere and cold air moving away from the Poles at ground level. What the Coriolis effect does is change the pattern of this circulation so that it is no longer along a straight North-South line.
 
That makes sense, thanks a lot!
 
We've just had an interesting thread about generation ships, but I don't think that that is the most reasonable way to colonize another planet. Fatal problems: - Crew may become chaotic and self destructive. - Crew may become so adapted to space as to be unwilling to return to a planet. - Making the planet habitable may take longer then the trip, so the ship needs to last far longer than just the journey. - Mid-flight malfunction may render the ship unable to decelerate at the destination...
I know this topic is extremely contraversial and debated, but I'm writing a book where an AI attempts to become as human as possible. Would it, eventually, especially in the far future, be possible for an AI to gain a conscious? To be clear, my definition of a consciousness being the ability to possess self-created morals, thoughts, and views, AKA a whole personality. And if this is possible (and let's just say it is for this question), about how long may it take for something to happen...
This is a question for people who know about astrophysics. It's been said that the habitable zones around red dwarf stars are so close to those stars that any planets in the zones would be tidally locked to the stars in question. With one side roasting and another side freezing almost forever, those planets wouldn't be hospitable to life. a) Could there be forms of life--whole ecologies--that first evolve in the planet's twilight zone and then extend their habitat by burrowing...

Similar threads

Replies
15
Views
5K
Replies
1
Views
3K
Back
Top