Gravity: Thoughts on Earth's Center Point

  • Thread starter Thread starter Phalid
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Gravity
Phalid
Messages
6
Reaction score
0
Allow me to preface the following with an apology if the question I ask sseem a bit off.

While reading Coming Of Age In The Milky Way by Timothy Ferris I came across a line in which he states:

"Earths gravitational force extends from its center point"

My understanding of gravity is that it is nothing more than curved space-time. The mass of objects warp the space-time and that warping is what produces the attractive force. Why would the Earth's gravitational force extend from its center point. How can the center of the Earth warp space-time unless space-time exists within the Earth at its center? Wouldn't the outer edges of Earth's surface be the source of the space-time warping since that is the area which comes in "contact" with space-time?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Phalid said:
Allow me to preface the following with an apology if the question I ask sseem a bit off.

While reading Coming Of Age In The Milky Way by Timothy Ferris I came across a line in which he states:

"Earths gravitational force extends from its center point"

My understanding of gravity is that it is nothing more than curved space-time. The mass of objects warp the space-time and that warping is what produces the attractive force. Why would the Earth's gravitational force extend from its center point. How can the center of the Earth warp space-time unless space-time exists within the Earth at its center? Wouldn't the outer edges of Earth's surface be the source of the space-time warping since that is the area which comes in "contact" with space-time?

No. Space-time is everywhere and everything. Gravity curves the fabric of the universe and everything in it. When gravity "curves" space-time it does so in a higher dimension. Our 3 dimensional perception of the univierse doesn't change.
 
Each little piece of the Earth contributes to the total curvature at any given point. The curvature at a given point is proportional to the the gravitational force at that point. At points in the interior of the Earth, the gravitational force is proportional to the total mass below that point times the distance to the center. So the gravity (and curvature) gradually decrease as you burrow down toward the center. At the exact center of the Earth, the gravitational force (and curvature) is zero (all the mass is pulling equally outward, cancelling to zero.)

By the way, if the Earth was a hollow shell, with all its mass concentrated in the shell, there would be no gravity (from Earth) in the interior. At a given interior point, there would be a pull from a small part of the nearby shell which would be exactly counteracted by the pull in the opposite direction from the larger but more distant part of the shell.
 
I mis-stated something in my previous post. I said gravitational force is proportional to distance from the center. It's actually inversely proportional. So if there was just a spec of mass at the very center, and if you could get very very close to that spec, you would experience very high gravity (and space-time) curvature. The same would apply to any spec of mass anywhere in the Earth. If you could get right next to an electron, you could experience extremely large gravitational curvature (within that tiny radius). But maybe quantum mechanics keeps small things far enough apart (via the uncertainty principle) to prevent huge gravitational forces.

Another thought: The gravational curvature of space-time within the Earth is not smooth on a small scale. It's very bumpy - very large close to particles, very small in between. But on a large scale it looks like a smoothly varying curvature.
 
Ray Eston Smith Jr said:
I mis-stated something in my previous post. I said gravitational force is proportional to distance from the center. It's actually inversely proportional. So if there was just a spec of mass at the very center, and if you could get very very close to that spec, you would experience very high gravity (and space-time) curvature.
I don't think that's correct--in Newtonian terms, as you get closer to the center, the only gravity you feel is from the sphere of matter that's at a radius closer to the center than your current radius, while all the matter at a greater radius than you can be treated as a hollow sphere and as you pointed out when you're inside a hollow sphere its gravity cancels out. So, if you're only 1 kilometer from the center, the gravity you'd feel is the same as what you'd feel standing on the surface of a sphere of radius 1 kilometer (and the same mass as is contained in the 1 km radius from the center of the Earth) which was isolated in deep space, which is going to be a lot weaker than the gravity you feel on the Earth's surface.
 
Thread 'Can this experiment break Lorentz symmetry?'
1. The Big Idea: According to Einstein’s relativity, all motion is relative. You can’t tell if you’re moving at a constant velocity without looking outside. But what if there is a universal “rest frame” (like the old idea of the “ether”)? This experiment tries to find out by looking for tiny, directional differences in how objects move inside a sealed box. 2. How It Works: The Two-Stage Process Imagine a perfectly isolated spacecraft (our lab) moving through space at some unknown speed V...
Does the speed of light change in a gravitational field depending on whether the direction of travel is parallel to the field, or perpendicular to the field? And is it the same in both directions at each orientation? This question could be answered experimentally to some degree of accuracy. Experiment design: Place two identical clocks A and B on the circumference of a wheel at opposite ends of the diameter of length L. The wheel is positioned upright, i.e., perpendicular to the ground...
According to the General Theory of Relativity, time does not pass on a black hole, which means that processes they don't work either. As the object becomes heavier, the speed of matter falling on it for an observer on Earth will first increase, and then slow down, due to the effect of time dilation. And then it will stop altogether. As a result, we will not get a black hole, since the critical mass will not be reached. Although the object will continue to attract matter, it will not be a...

Similar threads

Back
Top