Gravity vs Diffraction in Troposphere of a Star

Buckeye
Messages
164
Reaction score
2
How can we decide which process is causing light to bend near the surface of a star? Gravity is said to cause light to bend or deflect as it passes near the huge mass of a star. But matter in the troposphere of a star should also cause light to bend or deflect as it passes through the troposphere of the star because there should be a lot of matter (electrons, protons, H and He) in the troposphere of a star. How do I decide which is the dominant effect?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
I am new to relativity and you should consider some expert opinion than mine, but as this question is more of optics, let me take a chance. I will only say about the refraction point of view.

As refraction depends upon the refractive index of the material (which depends upon wavelength), light with different wavelengths (all from same distant star) should refract to different extents. Thus, If considerable refraction is taking place at all, the distant star should be seen as images of the star in many different colors. Just like prism separates visible light. Plus, the refractive index back calculated comes out to be near 2, which is not plausible for any gaseous mixture. (There is a paper on arxive regarding this and some refraction point of view for black holes).

Again, don't depend upon my point of view.
 
Last edited:
Correct, refraction depends on the wavelength of the light (this is called dispersion), whereas gravitational bending doesn't. Also, gravitational bending of radio waves by the sun, from pulsars or some such thing, has been studied at large angles from the sun (as seen from the earth) where the sun's atmosphere would not be involved at all.
 
Buckeye said:
How can we decide which process is causing light to bend near the surface of a star? Gravity is said to cause light to bend or deflect as it passes near the huge mass of a star. But matter in the troposphere of a star should also cause light to bend or deflect as it passes through the troposphere of the star because there should be a lot of matter (electrons, protons, H and He) in the troposphere of a star. How do I decide which is the dominant effect?

It can be done if you have the mass of the star, and a measurement of the deflection at some known distance from the star.

Calculate the gravitational deflection for the known mass and distance, and compare it to the actual measured deflection. If they're nearly equal, then gravity is the dominant effect. If the measurement is considerably larger than the calculation, then refraction dominates.

p.s. While a calculation of the refractive part is possible in principle, it would require detailed knowledge of the atmosphere's density and composition as a function of altitude above the surface.
 
jtbell said:
...(as seen from the earth) where the sun's atmosphere would not be involved at all.
Sun's atmosphere extends to Earth and even beyond (Encyclopedia Britannica: "Corona"), not that it makes any difference though, as It won't achieve the necessary refractive index!
 
OK, so this has bugged me for a while about the equivalence principle and the black hole information paradox. If black holes "evaporate" via Hawking radiation, then they cannot exist forever. So, from my external perspective, watching the person fall in, they slow down, freeze, and redshift to "nothing," but never cross the event horizon. Does the equivalence principle say my perspective is valid? If it does, is it possible that that person really never crossed the event horizon? The...
ASSUMPTIONS 1. Two identical clocks A and B in the same inertial frame are stationary relative to each other a fixed distance L apart. Time passes at the same rate for both. 2. Both clocks are able to send/receive light signals and to write/read the send/receive times into signals. 3. The speed of light is anisotropic. METHOD 1. At time t[A1] and time t[B1], clock A sends a light signal to clock B. The clock B time is unknown to A. 2. Clock B receives the signal from A at time t[B2] and...
From $$0 = \delta(g^{\alpha\mu}g_{\mu\nu}) = g^{\alpha\mu} \delta g_{\mu\nu} + g_{\mu\nu} \delta g^{\alpha\mu}$$ we have $$g^{\alpha\mu} \delta g_{\mu\nu} = -g_{\mu\nu} \delta g^{\alpha\mu} \,\, . $$ Multiply both sides by ##g_{\alpha\beta}## to get $$\delta g_{\beta\nu} = -g_{\alpha\beta} g_{\mu\nu} \delta g^{\alpha\mu} \qquad(*)$$ (This is Dirac's eq. (26.9) in "GTR".) On the other hand, the variation ##\delta g^{\alpha\mu} = \bar{g}^{\alpha\mu} - g^{\alpha\mu}## should be a tensor...

Similar threads

Back
Top