Gravity Well & Speed of Light: Questions & Answers

la grange
Messages
1
Reaction score
0
Does a gravity well affect the speed of light? I would assume not because I know the speed of light to be a constant and that's how I have always been taught but now I am starting to question this. Also, would gravity wells affect the approximated age of the universe, and if so, by how much?

Thanks for the help guys!
-Grange
 
Physics news on Phys.org
You may have more luck with this one in the relativity forum :wink: Admins move this maybe?
But all observers measure the speed of light to be c. That much I can tell you as fact. As to the age of the universe, I asked a similar question at the end of a lecture at an open day once. The short answer is no, as gravitational effects on time are only significant for very intensely strong fields. It's also worth pointing out that by far the biggest constraint on our estimate of the age of the universe is our uncertainty in the value of Hubble's constant. We think it's around ~70 (km/s)/Mpc, but estimates range over 50-100 (km/s)/Mpc.
 
gravity wells cannot change the speed of light in GR. They can change the trajectory light travels, of course.
 
la grange said:
Does a gravity well affect the speed of light? I would assume not because I know the speed of light to be a constant and that's how I have always been taught but now I am starting to question this.

Don't confuse gravity wells with relativistic gravitation (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gravity_well#Gravity_wells_and_general_relativity"). Measured with a local clock the speed of light is constant everywhere. But a local clock runs slower near a mass. So, measured with a faster distant clock light appears to be slower near a mass.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
I started reading a National Geographic article related to the Big Bang. It starts these statements: Gazing up at the stars at night, it’s easy to imagine that space goes on forever. But cosmologists know that the universe actually has limits. First, their best models indicate that space and time had a beginning, a subatomic point called a singularity. This point of intense heat and density rapidly ballooned outward. My first reaction was that this is a layman's approximation to...
Thread 'Dirac's integral for the energy-momentum of the gravitational field'
See Dirac's brief treatment of the energy-momentum pseudo-tensor in the attached picture. Dirac is presumably integrating eq. (31.2) over the 4D "hypercylinder" defined by ##T_1 \le x^0 \le T_2## and ##\mathbf{|x|} \le R##, where ##R## is sufficiently large to include all the matter-energy fields in the system. Then \begin{align} 0 &= \int_V \left[ ({t_\mu}^\nu + T_\mu^\nu)\sqrt{-g}\, \right]_{,\nu} d^4 x = \int_{\partial V} ({t_\mu}^\nu + T_\mu^\nu)\sqrt{-g} \, dS_\nu \nonumber\\ &= \left(...
In Philippe G. Ciarlet's book 'An introduction to differential geometry', He gives the integrability conditions of the differential equations like this: $$ \partial_{i} F_{lj}=L^p_{ij} F_{lp},\,\,\,F_{ij}(x_0)=F^0_{ij}. $$ The integrability conditions for the existence of a global solution ##F_{lj}## is: $$ R^i_{jkl}\equiv\partial_k L^i_{jl}-\partial_l L^i_{jk}+L^h_{jl} L^i_{hk}-L^h_{jk} L^i_{hl}=0 $$ Then from the equation: $$\nabla_b e_a= \Gamma^c_{ab} e_c$$ Using cartesian basis ## e_I...
Back
Top