GRB vs Death Star: Could Gamma Rays Destroy Planets?

  • Context: High School 
  • Thread starter Thread starter Daniel Petka
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Death Star
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

A gamma ray burst (GRB) emits approximately 1044 joules of energy in a narrow cone, which can potentially affect planets within a certain distance. For Earth-like planets, the threshold for disintegration is about 820 astronomical units (AU), while heavier planets like Jupiter have a threshold of 90 AU. However, the narrow emission beam typically misses planets due to its alignment with the stellar rotation axis, and not all energy contributes to disintegration, as a plasma layer forms that absorbs much of the energy. Therefore, while GRBs can theoretically destroy planets, practical scenarios limit their effectiveness.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of gamma ray bursts (GRBs) and their energy output
  • Familiarity with astronomical units (AU) and their significance in distance measurement
  • Knowledge of gravitational binding energy and its implications for planetary stability
  • Basic principles of energy absorption and plasma formation in astrophysical contexts
NEXT STEPS
  • Research the mechanisms of gamma ray bursts and their effects on planetary atmospheres
  • Study the inverse square law and its applications in astrophysics
  • Explore the concept of gravitational binding energy in different planetary bodies
  • Investigate the formation and behavior of plasma layers in high-energy astrophysical events
USEFUL FOR

Astronomers, astrophysicists, and science enthusiasts interested in the effects of high-energy phenomena on planetary bodies.

Daniel Petka
Messages
147
Reaction score
16
A gamma ray burst radiates an enormous amount of energy.
Could it blow up planets like, let's say a Death Star can if they were close enough? I can imagine that, since grbs are able do destroy an atmosphere while being light years away.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: hsdrop
Physics news on Phys.org
An Earth-like atmosphere has a negligible mass compared to a planet, and "messing up the chemistry" is different from "completely removing the atmosphere".

GRB emit something like 1044 J in a cone of a few degrees width, something like 1/3000 of the full solid angle. Values from here. Inside the cone, the intensity corresponds to an isotropic emission of 3*1047 J.

Earth has a gravitational binding energy of 2*1032 J.

A naive application of the inverse square law shows the planet doesn't receive enough energy to be disintegrated if it is more than 820 AU away. This value is much smaller for heavier planets (90 AU for Jupiter) and larger for smaller planets.

A planet in the system of the exploding star could receive enough energy. There are two caveats, however:
- the energy is emitted in a narrow beam aligned with the stellar rotation axis. In most systems, this is outside the plane where the planets orbit. The intense main beam will miss the planets.
- The assumption that all the energy hitting the planet goes into disassembling it is unrealistic. You would get a scenario like the last one here, where you quickly get a plasma layer and then most energy is absorbed by a surface layer of plasma.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: hsdrop
Thanks
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 24 ·
Replies
24
Views
2K
  • · Replies 40 ·
2
Replies
40
Views
8K
  • · Replies 29 ·
Replies
29
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
3K
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
3K
  • · Replies 0 ·
Replies
0
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
4K