MHB GRE: Solving "n" Integer Question: Determining Possible Values

  • Thread starter Thread starter CharlesLin
  • Start date Start date
AI Thread Summary
The discussion revolves around determining possible values for the positive integer "n" based on the condition that the smallest whole number greater than or equal to n/33 is either 1 or 2. It is established that if 2 is the only relevant threshold, then n must be less than 66. Participants clarify that any positive integer less than 66 satisfies the condition, not just 66 itself. The initial confusion regarding the values of n is resolved by recognizing that all integers from 1 to 65 are valid solutions. The conclusion emphasizes that any positive integer less than 66 is acceptable for n.
CharlesLin
Messages
16
Reaction score
0
I'm studying for the GRE and got stuck on this question

Suppose "n" is a positive integer such that the smallest whole number that is greater than or equal to n/33 is 1 or 2. Wich are possible values for the integer n? indicate all such integers.

a 15
b 24
c 50
d 66
e 77

what i start doing was giving values to "n" like n=15 then 15/33= .45 the this is not a possible value of "n" because the answer is not a whole number. following this logic, the only possible answer to me is d= 66. However my guide book saids ther more than that possble value for "n". How would you recommend to anwer this question?
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
The way I read the problem, we have either:

$$1>\frac{n}{33}$$

or

$$2>\frac{n}{33}$$

And since $2>1$, we need only consider:

$$2>\frac{n}{33}$$

This implies:

$$66>n$$
 
so are you saying that the only answer is 66 or that this is the only one that is not an answer?
 
I am saying any positive integer less than 66 is correct. :D
 
We only consider 2 because is larger than one. Then we have

2>n/33
33*2= 66

66>n

Any number less than 66 is value of “n”

Thank you very much!
 
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. In Dirac’s Principles of Quantum Mechanics published in 1930 he introduced a “convenient notation” he referred to as a “delta function” which he treated as a continuum analog to the discrete Kronecker delta. The Kronecker delta is simply the indexed components of the identity operator in matrix algebra Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/what-exactly-is-diracs-delta-function/ by...
Fermat's Last Theorem has long been one of the most famous mathematical problems, and is now one of the most famous theorems. It simply states that the equation $$ a^n+b^n=c^n $$ has no solutions with positive integers if ##n>2.## It was named after Pierre de Fermat (1607-1665). The problem itself stems from the book Arithmetica by Diophantus of Alexandria. It gained popularity because Fermat noted in his copy "Cubum autem in duos cubos, aut quadratoquadratum in duos quadratoquadratos, et...
Thread 'Imaginary Pythagorus'
I posted this in the Lame Math thread, but it's got me thinking. Is there any validity to this? Or is it really just a mathematical trick? Naively, I see that i2 + plus 12 does equal zero2. But does this have a meaning? I know one can treat the imaginary number line as just another axis like the reals, but does that mean this does represent a triangle in the complex plane with a hypotenuse of length zero? Ibix offered a rendering of the diagram using what I assume is matrix* notation...
Back
Top