Great one-liners from PF members

  • Thread starter Thread starter sysprog
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Members
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The forum discussion highlights a collection of humorous and insightful one-liners shared by members of the Physics Forums. Notable contributions include @vanhees71's commentary on the complexities of the third law in relativity and @russ_watters' satirical take on homeopathy, emphasizing its ineffectiveness due to the absence of active ingredients. The exchange showcases the wit and intellect of the community, with members like @phinds and @Nugatory contributing to the lighthearted yet thought-provoking dialogue. Overall, the discussion serves as a testament to the engaging and humorous nature of scientific discourse among forum members.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of basic physics concepts, including Newton's laws and relativity.
  • Familiarity with homeopathy and its principles.
  • Knowledge of scientific discourse and humor in academic settings.
  • Awareness of the Physics Forums community and its culture.
NEXT STEPS
  • Explore the implications of Newton's Third Law in modern physics.
  • Research the scientific critique of homeopathy and its methodologies.
  • Investigate the role of humor in scientific communication and education.
  • Engage with the Physics Forums to participate in discussions on scientific topics.
USEFUL FOR

This discussion is beneficial for physics enthusiasts, educators, and anyone interested in the intersection of humor and science. It provides insights into how scientific concepts can be communicated effectively and entertainingly within a community setting.

  • #271
(whisper) Hey guys, there's plenty of room for discussion in re the axiom of choice and the continuum hypothesis available elsewhere on PF; thanks for not continuing those topics here.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: BvU
Physics news on Phys.org
  • #272
I don't understand it. I just quote experts. ##-## @Hornbein
 
  • Like
  • Haha
Likes   Reactions: PhDeezNutz, DrClaude, jack action and 2 others
  • #273
Two lines, but it made me laugh
Strilanc said:
I come from quantum computing, where measurement is *extremely* well delineated. In your circuit diagrams, it's the box that has an M in it :biggrin:.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: BvU and fresh_42
  • #274
vanhees71 said:
The only accurate visualization of curved spacetime I know is to just look out at the real universe.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: Astronuc and vanhees71
  • #275
More like a Spoonerism... but worth a chuckle.

From a thread on Covid Variant Omicron (B1.1.529).
bhobba said:
I would like greater availability of the Pfizer pill, which is 90% effective at parenting death.
 
  • Haha
  • Love
Likes   Reactions: bhobba and berkeman
  • #276
The self defeating mindset is really a problem. If you don't believe it, you'll most likely not going to pass. ##-## @0kelvin
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: Lnewqban
  • #277
Yes, one can add riptides, sharp rocks, 'rogue' waves, cold water, strong currents, kelp tangles, live and dead jellyfish, oil and sewer spills, stoned surfers and boogey boarders, and sociopathic yachtsmen firing guns near shore to the dangers of open ocean swimming. ##-## @Klystron
 
  • Like
  • Love
Likes   Reactions: Klystron and BillTre
  • #278
It would be pretty ironic if I had accidentally used the word “deliberately”. ##-# @Dale
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: Klystron and jack action
  • #279
Why don't you calculate the escape velocity of the Moon from that and check online to see whether you are right? ##-## @PeroK
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: Keith_McClary and BvU
  • #280
Orodruin said:
Writing your question with the erroneous assumption in bold is not going to make the assumption true.
:bow:
 
  • Like
  • Haha
Likes   Reactions: PhDeezNutz, Klystron, DrClaude and 5 others
  • #281
jbriggs444 said:
If you can blow up the sun, powering a dipping bird may not be high on your list of tasks remaining to be accomplished.
I guess it depends how big a dipping bird...
 
  • Haha
Likes   Reactions: Keith_McClary and jbriggs444
  • #282
What did work-energy ever do to you to deserve this abuse? ##-## @russ_watters
 
  • Haha
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: Klystron, phinds, berkeman and 2 others
  • #283
Breaking an incalculable problem into two incalculable steps may not get you very far. ##-## @Vanadium 50
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: russ_watters, DrClaude, bhobba and 1 other person
  • #284
From a thread in Academic Guidance where we were trying to help a struggling Engineering student who kept alluding to using cheating to get by...

Vanadium 50 said:
Its probably worth pointing out that when engineers cheat, people die.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: PhDeezNutz, Klystron, russ_watters and 6 others
  • #285
berkeman said:
From a thread in Academic Guidance where we were trying to help a struggling Engineering student who kept alluding to using cheating to get by...
Vanadium 50 said:
Its probably worth pointing out that when engineers cheat, people die.
When Ferdinand Sauerbruch [a famous surgeon] had Max Liebermann [a famous painter] portray him, he soon found sitting too long. But the artist reassured him: "There's no other way. If you make a mistake, the green lawn will cover it up the next day. But you can see my mistake hanging on the wall for a hundred years."
 
  • Haha
  • Like
  • Wow
Likes   Reactions: strangerep, Borg, jack action and 2 others
  • #286
berkeman said:
From a thread in Academic Guidance where we were trying to help a struggling Engineering student who kept alluding to using cheating to get by...
It's a very good point. I remember very distinctly the Kansas city walkway collapse, and it really came down to a poor engineering decision. The original design should have been fine.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: russ_watters, bhobba and berkeman
  • #287
LOL, this was asked of me in a thread today...

Mike S. said:
Odd. Why is Google your friend if you're looking it up in Wikipedia?
 
  • Haha
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: sysprog, jack action and anorlunda
  • #288
The universe is not Euclidean. That doesn't mean there isn't (still) Euclidean geometry. ##-## @PeroK
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: PeroK
  • #289
sysprog said:
The universe is not Euclidean. That doesn't mean there isn't (still) Euclidean geometry. ##-## @PeroK
I'm glad someone understood what I meant!
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: sysprog and Keith_McClary
  • #290
PeroK said:
I would describe your theory in tauro-scatological terms.
 
  • Like
  • Haha
Likes   Reactions: PhDeezNutz, strangerep, Bystander and 6 others
  • #291
PeroK said:
I would describe your theory in tauro-scatological terms.

That one took me a few minutes.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: PhDeezNutz, strangerep and sysprog
  • #292
gmax137 said:
That one took me a few minutes.
I stole it from Tom Wolfe, in The Bonfire of the Vanities.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: PhDeezNutz, Klystron and sysprog
  • #293
gmax137 said:
That one took me a few minutes.
It probably helps if you click the up-arrow in the quote to see the context of his reply. :smile:
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: sysprog
  • #294
berkeman said:
It probably helps if you click the up-arrow in the quote to see the context of his reply. :smile:
I tried that, and still sat and stared at it until the light bulb lit.
 
  • Informative
Likes   Reactions: berkeman
  • #295
Vanadium 50 said:
Its probably worth pointing out that when engineers cheat, people die.

Sometimes, that's the rub. Usually though, the people they work for make a bit more money, at least for a while until the market decides your product sucks or the regulators and lawyers find out.

Hence the quality/safety problem that isn't uncommon in engineering: Do I quit, or do what my idiot boss wants? This is often an extremely complex and subtle issue. No ethics class will give you the answer to your particular dilemma. Other times it's not a dilemma, you might be clueless working beyond your expertise, à la Dunning-Kruger.

Are the engineers that designed the Ford Pinto worse than the engineers that designed the Toyota Corolla? I think probably not, they just worked for different people.
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: Lnewqban
  • #296
gmax137 said:
I tried that, and still sat and stared at it until the light bulb lit.
You have one of those energy efficient bulbs that take a while to brighten?
 
  • Haha
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: Klystron, Tom.G, berkeman and 2 others
  • #297
DaveE said:
Do I quit, or do what my idiot boss wants?
Chicago Police: Who called the Police?
Beautiful girl (PhD candidate) working at coffee shop counter: My idiot boss.
Police: Why did he call the Police?
Beautiful: Because he's an idiot.
CPD: Tell your idiot boss don't call the Police unless he has a good reason.
BG: Well, I'll tell him, but I don't think he'll listen.
CPD [Leaves without comment]: (maybe a bit of a harrumph).
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: Lnewqban
  • #298
Dullard said:
This might be a chance to teach the most useful general rule in all of science:

(Some of it) + (The rest of it) = (All of it)
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: berkeman, BillTre, sysprog and 1 other person
  • #299
Mass is constant in a closed system. But in an open system where stuff can come in or out, it manifestly isn't constant, as the example of a person eating shows. ##-## @Ibix
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: PhDeezNutz, Lnewqban and BillTre
  • #300
  • Haha
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: Vanadium 50, Lnewqban, BvU and 1 other person

Similar threads

  • · Replies 32 ·
2
Replies
32
Views
3K
  • · Replies 77 ·
3
Replies
77
Views
14K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 141 ·
5
Replies
141
Views
16K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K
Replies
39
Views
9K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K
  • · Replies 26 ·
Replies
26
Views
5K
  • · Replies 26 ·
Replies
26
Views
3K