- #386
- 17,645
- 18,339
We say "butter to the fishes" if we demand supporting facts.
So what came first? The person or the parsnip?Ahh, that makes more sense now. We "butter people up" on this side of the pond as well.
A bit oldie, used to be a common saying. I don't know how commonly people eat parsnips any more - as I remember nobody really liked them.Love that. Is it a common aphorism? I have not heard it before.
Is that a "we" German or Mathematics?We say "butter to the fishes" if we demand supporting facts.
... which is why butter is desperately needed, I guess. Somehow the traditional version of "In case of doubt add bacon (optional: cheese)!"A bit oldie, used to be a common saying. I don't know how commonly people eat parsnips any more - as I remember nobody really liked them.
Now to chase down a buttered pig to put in my parsnips.... which is why butter is desperately needed, I guess. Somehow the traditional version of "In case of doubt add bacon (optional: cheese)!"
That is mean. I am not a hypocrite, I love all forms of pig.Now to chase down a buttered pig to put in my parsnips.
I hate parsnips, even with butter. Give me a nice boiled potato with butter, sour cream, grated cheese, and some mexican <whatever> any day.
I'm quite partial to a roast (unbuttered) parsnip now and then.A bit oldie, used to be a common saying. I don't know how commonly people eat parsnips any more - as I remember nobody really liked them.
With a little olive oil and roasted in the oven until sweet. Yum. Had my first parsnip a age fifty...not popular during my youthI'm quite partial to a roast (unbuttered) parsnip now and then.
I'm not so fond of brussels sprouts. My favourite vegetable is the leek. The most spectacular is the Romanesco broccoli:With a little olive oil and roasted in the oven until sweet. Yum. Had my first parsnip a age fifty...not popular during my youth
Apparently the "yum" part is quite subjective and seems hard-wired in our genes: https://www.sciencefocus.com/the-human-body/why-do-some-people-hate-brussels-sprouts/
Not a one-liner by any means but full of insight. I do remember as a younger student being frustrated at not having immediate overarching perspective/intuition. Things were so easy at the 2000 level that when it came to higher level classes I hit a wall because things were no longer intuitive.Partially because the future physics is truly unknown. Also because teaching how it fits would require you to understand the subjects you don't yet know and that is not efficient. But, where possible, we agree
Teaching the elementary methods to bright students is particularly difficult because often they use shortcuts to do the simple provblems: "Why do I need to draw a free body analysis when I can just write down answer from my head ?" The method of analysis is what is being taught, not how to play with Atwood Machines. Soon enough the problems will be non-intuitive. You need some faith that these folks understand what they are doing.
I was not complaining about your post specifically but all of the last several posts. I feel the thread got off track and no, I don't agree that this is the right thread to celebrate long posts. If you'd like to start a new thread to do that then do so. Let's keep this to one-liners.Yes most of the posts highlighted in the thread are witty one liners. But why not highlight good posts in general? Assuming they aren’t too technical/content heavy.
Please don't! We already have a backup procedure in place.If you'd like to start a new thread to do that then do so.
Please don't! We already have a backup procedure in place.
And don't forget that we use only recycled electrons from natural sources!
Finest kind!And don't forget that we use only recycled electrons!
THAT is a one liner.Finest kind!
Give fresh his due. I didn't think Mathematicians cared about that stuff.And don't forget that we use only recycled electrons from natural sources!
Oh, we do. We are idealists, whereas some merely in the Platonic sense, but yes. It is the reality that we usually fail gloriously at.I didn't think Mathematicians cared about that stuff.
Then I applied an "inverse acid-trip transform" to see what clean circuit concepts might have been present in the ancestral circuit, and how they might interrelate.
It would be like trying to deduce how a steam train works by looking at a child's wooden toy.
It's very difficult to counter a valid argument.
There are well known ways of countering valid arguments. "The Big Lie", "Straw man", "Ad hominem", "Equivocation", "Post hoc ergo propter hoc", "Deflect and distract, never give in, never admit fault, lie and attack, lie and attack".... not that we wouldn't try!
There's a reason that the datasheets have lots of writing on them.
Just wanted to add that birds of a feather flock together and there aren't a lot of intelligent birds.
Hey, chirp for yourself!Hmm. Then what are we all doing here on PF?![]()
Caw CawHmm. Then what are we all doing here on PF?![]()
Yup!Caw Caw
Corvids are highly intelligent.In a thread asking about a questionable psychological relation...