Great one-liners from PF members

  • Thread starter Thread starter sysprog
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Members
AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers around sharing and appreciating humorous and witty one-liners from the Physics Forums. Participants highlight various clever remarks, often related to physics, science, and the absurdities of homeopathy. Notable contributions include quips about relativity, the limitations of crayons, and humorous takes on homeopathic remedies. The thread also touches on the nature of scientific discourse, emphasizing that interesting questions often arise amid conflicting ideas. Additionally, there are playful exchanges about the nuances of communication, humor in technical discussions, and the importance of clarity in scientific explanations. Overall, the thread celebrates the blend of humor and intellect found within scientific discussions.
  • #601
To be fair, my wife was cooking bacon at the time. So, yeah. The only other products that came to mind (eggs and tortillas) weren’t sold by weight.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
  • #602
berkeman said:
Hey, waidaminute, why don't supermarkets have these anymore?
1709527210583.png

The quintessential 'banana for scale'.
 
  • Like
  • Haha
Likes Vanadium 50 and Dale
  • #603
exponent137 said:
Yes
For leaving V50 speechless. :-p

Vanadium 50 said:
Wow. Just wow.
 
  • Haha
  • Like
Likes pinball1970, DrClaude, Vanadium 50 and 1 other person
  • #604
Oh, I had a comment, all right. I just figured it would be best if kept to myself.
 
  • Like
  • Haha
Likes marcusl, pinball1970, dextercioby and 5 others
  • #605
Vanadium 50 said:
That press release was...um...sufficiently rich in organic material that it could itself be used as a renewable fuel.
 
  • Like
  • Haha
Likes BillTre, marcusl, pinball1970 and 4 others
  • #606
In a thread asking about making food from just raw elements
BillTre said:
You have a series of different questions:
1) Can you eat the periodic table?
A: yes depending on what it is printed on.
:smile:
 
  • Haha
  • Like
Likes SammyS, dextercioby, pinball1970 and 2 others
  • #607
In a thread discussing how to judge the validity of sources (not peer-reviewed):

Vanadium 50 said:
As they said "If it ducks like a quack..."
 
  • Like
Likes PhDeezNutz, DaveC426913, jack action and 2 others
  • #608
In a thread where the OP is trying to identify why a bracket has been failing before its expected life:
jrmichler said:
Syed7777777 said:
I'm trying to simulate this in FEA to identify the weak spots
No need for FEA to do that. The weak spots are where it breaks.
 
  • Haha
  • Like
Likes OmCheeto, DrClaude, DaveE and 3 others
  • #609
berkeman said:
In a thread discussing how to judge the validity of sources (not peer-reviewed):
You had to be there.
 
  • Haha
Likes pinball1970
  • #610
Sometimes we have to school newbies on the obvious...

Baluncore said:
Avoid sifting flour by the light of a candle.
 
  • #611
1713363231482.png
 
  • #612
berkeman said:
In a thread discussing how to judge the validity of sources (not peer-reviewed):
As they said "If it ducks like a quack..."
This gets wittier the more I read it.

In fact, it's positively steal-worthy for some of the woo discussions I get caught in.
 
  • Like
Likes Rive, BillTre and berkeman
  • #613
Yes, it's a pleasant mix of dyslexic double entendre and skepticism.
 
  • Like
Likes pinball1970, Rive and BillTre
  • #614
Vanadium 50 said:
It's much easier to revolutionize the world if you don't have to put numbers in.
 
  • Like
Likes pinball1970 and sysprog1
  • #615
Upon witnessing the chaos unfolding in a different department at work, I once quipped “not my circus, not my monkeys.”

Only it came out as “not my cirkeys, not my monkus.”

It took a solid minute for everyone to stop laughing.
 
  • Like
Likes PhDeezNutz and phinds
  • #616
I once was talking to my new boss from home on my flip phone but needed to take some notes so I asked her to "please give me a second to put on my head free handset. Fortunately she had a sense of humor and we both got a good laugh out of it.
 
  • Like
Likes PhDeezNutz, pinball1970 and BillTre
  • #617
phinds said:
head free handset
For some calls I am on such a thing would be a welcome change... :wink:
 
  • Like
  • Love
  • Haha
Likes PhDeezNutz, pinball1970, phinds and 3 others
  • #618
From the thread about Dr. Hossenfelder's "7 Coincidences" video:

Vanadium 50 said:
I once stayed at a hotel room where the room number was the same as the mass of the Λ baryon. Coincidence? I think not!

:smile:
 
  • Like
Likes marcusl and PhDeezNutz
  • #619
@gleem giving more good advice and motivation in the Academic Advising forum... :smile:

gleem said:
That spark that you mentioned is what lights the fire that burns inside of you to find out what has yet to be learned.
 
  • Like
Likes PhDeezNutz, sysprog1, Borg and 3 others
  • #620
russ_watters said:
Here's the risk with engineers: we're creative and often have loose or missing screws, so if you constrain your problem insufficiently there is a decent chance the answer will involve a trebuchet.
 
  • Like
  • Haha
  • Love
Likes Klystron, dwarde, DrClaude and 8 others
  • #621
googles trebuchet.......

still does not get the joke....
 
  • #622
pinball1970 said:
googles trebuchet.......

still does not get the joke....
The device under discussion was some kind of vaguely specified energy generation scheme involving animals (probably cattle) moving around and having their energy harvested somehow. At least some of the ideas involved fairly brutal accelerations when you ran the numbers. The vagueness was a cause of some frustration.

I'm not sure if Russ was implying he'd use the cattle as ammo ("Fetchez la vache!") or as the counterweight.
 
  • Like
  • Informative
  • Haha
Likes PhDeezNutz, Borg, berkeman and 2 others
  • #623
pinball1970 said:
googles trebuchet.......

still does not get the joke....
I think what he meant a word of caution: "please constrain your problem well enough or engineers will run with it in the direction they think is fun, rather than useful" Because hey, if you can make a trebuchet within the given specs, that's just way more fun :cool:.
 
  • Like
Likes russ_watters, Hornbein, collinsmark and 6 others
  • #624
Ibix said:
"Fetchez la vache!"
Now go away, or I shall taunt you a second time.
 
  • Like
  • Haha
Likes russ_watters, pinball1970, Ibix and 2 others
  • #625
jbriggs444 said:
It helps if you have worked and played outside during your formative years. Then most of this stuff is second nature.
 
  • Like
Likes pinball1970 and Klystron
  • #626
Borg said:
If Schwarzenegger shows up naked in my backyard, I'm hitting the report button.
 
  • Like
Likes pinball1970, PhDeezNutz and BillTre
  • #627
pinball1970 said:
I never really got the title. Did he have a "breakdown" in the mental health sense? No! He was absolutely coherent, organised and focused. He was also very smart and professional, at every turn.
The concepts of 'doing bad' and making good with your life and talents appear often in this series. Walter, as Jessie's high school chemistry teacher, lectured about the benefits of applying oneself in order to achieve. See the portrait Jessie drew on the rear of a failed exam of Mr. White with a large screw. "Apply yourself!" Mr. White demands.

Later as criminal partners, Jessie refers archly and satirically to Walter "breaking bad" as per Gilligan's title. Jesse using this slang expression to describe White's behaviour begs the question, "Was Mr. White a good man driven after a cancer diagnosis to support his family via vile crimes, or was Walter always a suppressed criminal posing as a teacher who enjoys being master criminal Heisenberg?".

Jessie resolves this dilemma after contemplation during rehab, telling Walter, "I know this now, I am the bad guy.", leaving Walter to sort out his own morality.
 
Last edited:
  • Love
Likes pinball1970
  • #628
WWGD said:
Welcome to PF! I failed my Turing test, btw ;).
 
  • Like
Likes berkeman and WWGD
  • #629
Baluncore said:
If you are really trying to invent an accurate hand-wound mechanical clock, then you are 300 years too late. You are so far behind, that you think you are first.
 
  • Like
Likes marcusl, Klystron and PhDeezNutz
  • #630
In a thread about those who decide to build a particle accelerator in their basement
Vanadium 50 said:
The correlation between ambition and cluelessness seems high.
 
  • Like
Likes pinball1970, jack action, Klystron and 2 others
  • #631
Well it easy to get psyched up if you don't know the problems.
 
  • Like
Likes pinball1970
  • #632
phinds said:
In a thread about those who decide to build a particle accelerator in their basement

I think this stems from Michio Kaku’s book “hyperspace” where he claims to have built a “particle accelerator” in his garage while in high school.

He’s rather trite imo.

Personal Commentary: I hate pop-sci. Sometimes it seems necessary to get the general public interested……and at other times it seems like a ploy for some to glean unwarranted notoriety;

“look at me I’m so smart I argue with neckbeards about Bigfoot on twitter, I am the embodiment of intellect”

None of this serves to help actual Physics students advance.
 
  • #633
PhDeezNutz said:
I think this stems from Michio Kaku’s book “hyperspace” where he claims to have built a “particle accelerator” in his garage while in high school.
Maybe he did and the radiation exposure did something to the part of his brain that is supposed to instantiate humility.
 
  • Haha
Likes pinball1970, Klystron, BillTre and 3 others
  • #634
PhDeezNutz said:
Personal Commentary: I hate pop-sci.
You might feel even more strongly about it if you had to moderate here... :wink:
 
  • Like
  • Wow
  • Haha
Likes Astronuc, pinball1970, Borg and 3 others
  • #635
PeterDonis said:
You might feel even more strongly about it if you had to moderate here... :wink:

That is not a burden I am ready for. I am not advanced enough in my general understanding of physics (partially because I was disillusioned by pop science for many years) nor as an emotionally stable adult.

To that end I appreciate the efforts of the Mentors to keep discussions substantive and “in bounds”.
 
  • Like
Likes pinball1970, BillTre, phinds and 1 other person
  • #636
PhDeezNutz said:
That is not a burden I am ready for.
To be clear, I wasn't implying that you should become a moderator, just commenting on how "pop-sci" looks to moderators. (Michio Kaku is currently number 2 on my list of "people whose pop sci I wish would totally disappear", not far behind Brian Greene at number 1.)
 
  • Like
  • Wow
Likes Astronuc and pinball1970
  • #637
PhDeezNutz said:
To that end I appreciate the efforts of the Mentors to keep discussions substantive and “in bounds”.
Thanks for the kudos! :smile:
 
  • Like
Likes pinball1970
  • #638
PeterDonis said:
I wasn't implying that you should become a moderator, just commenting on how "pop-sci" looks to moderators. (Michio Kaku is currently number 2 on my list of "people whose pop sci I wish would totally disappear", not far behind Brian Greene at number 1.)

I know you weren’t implying I was ready for it, it was just a set up to say that I appreciate your efforts and those of other Mentors.
 
  • Like
Likes pinball1970, berkeman, sysprog1 and 1 other person
  • #639
Vanadium 50 said:
But nobody wants to tell billionaires "no" when they have their checkbooks out.
True facts.
 
  • Like
Likes pinball1970, PhDeezNutz and berkeman
  • #640
From a discussion of using waveguides rather than free-space propagation:

Baluncore said:
Think inside the box.
 
  • Like
  • Haha
Likes russ_watters, marcusl, Hornbein and 6 others
  • #641
From a thread on determining the volume of a star in GR:

Vanadium 50 said:
Is it worth pointing out that the difference between Newton and Einstein is much, much smaller than the uncertainty on where a star's surface actually is?
 
  • Like
Likes russ_watters
  • #642
In a thread on the maximum energy of a photon based on frame of reference
jbriggs444 said:
the total energy in the observable universe is an upper bound on photon energy ... the ability to collect that energy into a single photon would pose a significant engineering challenge.
Love that dry humor.
 
  • Like
Likes russ_watters
  • #643
From a discussion about hiking in the Grand Canyon in the summer.
russ_watters said:
It's easy to get in serious trouble if you don't appreciate the risks.

Seems to be applicable to much in life.
 
  • #645
From the Crowdstrike Debacle thread:

Vanadium 50 said:
Too many clones almost wiped out bananas.

(well, I guess you had to be there...) :smile:
 
  • #646
Sorry, sorry, more than one line. But way too classic...

WWGD said:
From the Olympics:
" Are you a Pole Vaulter?"
" No, I'm German. How did you know my name is Walter?"
 
  • Like
  • Haha
Likes Astronuc, phinds, pinball1970 and 4 others
  • #647
Vanadium 50 said:
Experimenters are not the oompa-loompas of science.

Need I say more? It's a very delicate symbiotic relationship between theorists and experimentalists. One is not greater than the other.............and people who think this are just not experienced enough to realize this. And if they have enough experience and still think this........they are willingly ignorant.

Edit: not sure if this one has already been mentioned.
 
Last edited:
  • Like
  • Haha
Likes jrmichler, BillTre, pinball1970 and 1 other person
  • #648
It's from The Big Bang Theory.

 
  • Like
Likes PhDeezNutz and BillTre
  • #649
Vanadium 50 said:
It's from The Big Bang Theory
Don't forget Roald Dahl!
 
  • #650
I believe those were the Oompa-Loompas of Loompa Land.

I doubt that the original message did any good. Too many people come here and say "I got an A in 12th grade physics. I do not wish to soil my hands with your dirty, filth experimental work. And with grades like mine, I shann't have to!"

Whatever.
 
  • Like
Likes PhDeezNutz and BillTre
Back
Top