Great one-liners from PF members

  • Thread starter Thread starter sysprog
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Members
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The forum discussion highlights a collection of humorous and insightful one-liners shared by members of the Physics Forums. Notable contributions include @vanhees71's commentary on the complexities of the third law in relativity and @russ_watters' satirical take on homeopathy, emphasizing its ineffectiveness due to the absence of active ingredients. The exchange showcases the wit and intellect of the community, with members like @phinds and @Nugatory contributing to the lighthearted yet thought-provoking dialogue. Overall, the discussion serves as a testament to the engaging and humorous nature of scientific discourse among forum members.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of basic physics concepts, including Newton's laws and relativity.
  • Familiarity with homeopathy and its principles.
  • Knowledge of scientific discourse and humor in academic settings.
  • Awareness of the Physics Forums community and its culture.
NEXT STEPS
  • Explore the implications of Newton's Third Law in modern physics.
  • Research the scientific critique of homeopathy and its methodologies.
  • Investigate the role of humor in scientific communication and education.
  • Engage with the Physics Forums to participate in discussions on scientific topics.
USEFUL FOR

This discussion is beneficial for physics enthusiasts, educators, and anyone interested in the intersection of humor and science. It provides insights into how scientific concepts can be communicated effectively and entertainingly within a community setting.

  • #541
From a thread where a math major is complaining that when he had to take a mandatory Physics course, he found the math in it to be very non-rigorous and not based on axioms...

andresB said:
Do you already know what the axioms of nature are?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
  • #542
While trying to give a B-level reply to a question about the speed of propagation of changes in spacetime...

Ibix said:
It's actually quite difficult to come up with a well-defined way of saying what you are trying to say without either resorting to postgrad maths or saying something not really accurate and crossing your fingers behind your back and hoping nobody asks awkward questions.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: pinball1970 and Ibix
  • #543
berkeman said:
From a thread where a math major is complaining that when he had to take a mandatory Physics course, he found the math in it to be very non-rigorous and not based on axioms...

From the very same thread:
russ_watters said:
I guarantee any stroke QM could give a mathematician, an engineer could make worse.
 
  • Haha
Likes   Reactions: DrClaude and DaveE
  • #544
From a thread discussing WiFi and Routers, @Vanadium 50 observed:

The number on the box is really mostly irrelevant. "Up to X Mbps" just means that they promise you won't get X+1.
 
  • #545
Vanadium on a post regarding David McCallum TV series.

pinball1970 said:
The Invisible man" 1975 series
V50 "I could never see him in that role."
 
  • Love
  • Haha
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: nsaspook, BillTre and DennisN
  • #546
Vanadium 50 said:
I could never see him in that role.
Not to be outdone our talented, the lovely,our very own @DennisN !!
"Also, as far as I can remember, the portrayal of the character was rather transparent."
 
  • #547
From a discussion in the Engineering forums about a part that a new user wants help designing:

Baluncore said:
If you have ignored the obvious failure modes, and so build a house of cards, that design failure may later be investigated by a Coroner.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: Klystron and DaveC426913
  • #548
From a discussion thread in the Academic Advising forum where a newbie is asking for advice about learning resources...

gmax137 said:
As others have noted, learning physics by reading alone would be like learning to play piano by reading a book. It simply is not possible.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: pinball1970
  • #549
berkeman said:
From a discussion thread in the Academic Advising forum where a newbie is asking for advice about learning resources...

gmax137 said:
As others have noted, learning physics by reading alone would be like learning to play piano by reading a book. It simply is not possible.
But the skills are transferable...

 
  • Like
  • Haha
Likes   Reactions: PeroK, collinsmark and berkeman
  • #550
Ibix said:
If I tell you that a scribblex is a fooddely scribblex if the warghandle is zero you might (reasonably) complain that this does not help you to understand what I'm talking about.
 
  • Haha
Likes   Reactions: pinball1970 and berkeman
  • #551
gleem said:
Decisions made by emotional inclinations can be risky or just dumb.
:smile:
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: berkeman
  • #552
Exactly. How many times have you grabbed the vanilla ice cream only to beat yourself up later knowing you should have gotten chocolate?
 
  • #553
Haborix said:
How many times have you grabbed the vanilla ice cream only to beat yourself up later knowing you should have gotten chocolate?
I solve this problem by not liking chocolate ice cream. :wink:
 
  • Like
  • Sad
  • Skeptical
Likes   Reactions: Wrichik Basu, BillTre, phinds and 2 others
  • #554
Agreed. IMHO, (French) vanilla is the only real flavor of ice cream!

-Dan
 
  • Like
  • Skeptical
Likes   Reactions: Wrichik Basu, Borg, Bystander and 1 other person
  • #555
Emack and Bolio's "Chocolate Moose" ice cream is excellent. But their "Vanilla Bean Speck" is outstanding.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: topsquark
  • #556
Well, if we are going to be picky, I’d almost always take butter pecan over either vanilla or chocolate.
 
  • #557
By @Baluncore in Engineering and Computer Sci Homework Help

Be productive, play LTspice simulation of circuits, not video games.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: Klystron
  • #558
Haborix said:
Well, if we are going to be picky, I’d almost always take butter pecan over either vanilla or chocolate.
I would agree w/ you about that but then we'd both be wrong. :oldlaugh:
 
  • Haha
Likes   Reactions: BillTre
  • #559
Nice metaphor by V50 when giving advice in the Academic Advising forum to a user who is considering switching majors into a more narrow specialty...

Vanadium 50 said:
If you shoot for such a narrow target, what happens if you miss?
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: Tom.G
  • #560
Well worth keeping in mind, I think:
PeterDonis said:
The fact that quantum systems behave highly non-classically in some cases does not mean they do so in all cases.
 
  • #561
All I can say is that you had to be there...

Vanadium 50 said:
But officer....I was only going 0.577c!
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: PhDeezNutz, pinball1970 and phinds
  • #562
topsquark said:
If someone comes on and tries to sell us a cold fusion water heater, then it's off to "banned camp."
 
  • Like
  • Haha
Likes   Reactions: Astronuc, PhDeezNutz, pinball1970 and 2 others
  • #563
Dale said:
Also, when people ask for clarification please just clarify without the guessing games. We are physicists not psychics.
(My emphasis.)

I checked the archives. Dale has used this phrase a few times before, but it's apt.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: PhDeezNutz, pinball1970, phinds and 1 other person
  • #564
Paraphrasing Arthur C. Clarke:
PeterDonis said:
sufficiently advanced cluelessness is indistinguishable from trolling.
 
  • Like
  • Haha
Likes   Reactions: hutchphd, Klystron, Hornbein and 8 others
  • #565
BvU said:
Can you please read your post and agree that telepathy is required to make sense of it ?
:bow:
 
  • Like
  • Haha
Likes   Reactions: Astronuc, PhDeezNutz, pinball1970 and 6 others
  • #566
And I didn't even get the message across ! :

Sam Groves said:
What do you mean?

##\ ##
 
  • Haha
Likes   Reactions: Vanadium 50, berkeman and topsquark
  • #567
DaveC426913 said:
But this seems like it's kind of bifurcating bunnies at this point.
Love it!
 
  • #568
Vanadium again

"Numerology is not science. And approximate numerology is not even numerology"
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: PhDeezNutz
  • #569
gmax137 said:
I think this is a really good point.

You know those posts, where the student is asking, 'but why is the work mgh?' -- I always think, "carry shingles up to the roofers for a week and then get back to me."

In a thread about teaching basic STEM concepts. Poster @Dr Transport mentioned that students can’t understand basic concepts because they lack hands on experience. I think manual labor could definitely help in cultivating physics intuition.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: Astronuc and vanhees71
  • #570
V50 strikes again:

"Evolution works on the four F's - fight, flight, feeding and reproduction."
 
  • Like
  • Haha
Likes   Reactions: pinball1970, jack action, berkeman and 3 others

Similar threads

  • · Replies 32 ·
2
Replies
32
Views
3K
  • · Replies 77 ·
3
Replies
77
Views
14K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 141 ·
5
Replies
141
Views
16K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K
Replies
39
Views
9K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K
  • · Replies 26 ·
Replies
26
Views
5K
  • · Replies 26 ·
Replies
26
Views
3K