Great one-liners from PF members

  • Thread starter Thread starter sysprog
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Members
AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers around sharing and appreciating humorous and witty one-liners from the Physics Forums. Participants highlight various clever remarks, often related to physics, science, and the absurdities of homeopathy. Notable contributions include quips about relativity, the limitations of crayons, and humorous takes on homeopathic remedies. The thread also touches on the nature of scientific discourse, emphasizing that interesting questions often arise amid conflicting ideas. Additionally, there are playful exchanges about the nuances of communication, humor in technical discussions, and the importance of clarity in scientific explanations. Overall, the thread celebrates the blend of humor and intellect found within scientific discussions.
  • #651
Vanadium 50 said:
I believe those were the Oompa-Loompas of Loompa Land.

I doubt that the original message did any good. Too many people come here and say "I got an A in 12th grade physics. I do not wish to soil my hands with your dirty, filth experimental work. And with grades like mine, I shann't have to!"

Whatever.

Yeah it’s definitely a misconception and a problem.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
  • #652
From a thread discussing differentiation and its definition(s)...

fresh_42 said:
I like to say that if you read two authors you will find four notations.
 
  • Like
Likes tellmesomething
  • #653
Is that like "If you lined all the economists in Washington end to end you still wouldn't reach a conclusion"?
 
  • Like
Likes PhDeezNutz and phinds
  • #654
BvU said:
And those that try to help you are not from the telepathy department.
This was in response to:
pallab said:
I am not from control theory background.
 
  • Like
  • Haha
Likes PhDeezNutz, phinds, fresh_42 and 2 others
  • #655
Vanadium 50 said:
How much repulsion do you need to add together to make it attractive?
LOL. I *think* he's referring to the electrons, but it may also be the thread.
 
  • #656
From the Academic Advice forum:

Vanadium 50 said:
As I have said before, your PhD thesis will not be "We finally understand the universe." It will be "The spectrum of glopolium".
 
  • Like
  • Haha
Likes PhDeezNutz, phinds, dwarde and 1 other person
  • #657
Sadly, not the first time I have said that. People just don't believe it. "Yeah, maybe for those other guys...."
 
  • Like
Likes PhDeezNutz and BillTre
  • #658
Vanadium 50 said:
Sadly, not the first time I have said that. People just don't believe it. "Yeah, maybe for those other guys...."
I have no idea how people cannot fathom that university will be anything but a pain once they have completed a few semesters. "It gets better!" Nope, it just gets worse and worse and worse and then one day you have your degree, and since I'm not quite there yet, I'll pretend that it gets better then. Probably not.
 
  • Sad
Likes pinball1970
  • #659
Mayhem said:
I have no idea how people cannot fathom that university will be anything but a pain once they have completed a few semesters. "It gets better!" Nope, it just gets worse and worse and worse and then one day you have your degree, and since I'm not quite there yet, I'll pretend that it gets better then. Probably not.
Change stuff. Where are you? Talk to people on your course, talk to people in the union bar, talk to people in the scientific club.
 
  • #660
From V50 in an Academic Advising thread:
Vanadium 50 said:
The most important factors, though, are not where you go. They are what you accomplish wherever you go.
 
  • Like
Likes PhDeezNutz, pinball1970 and jbriggs444
  • #661
This is too funny not to share. It's from a now-deleted thread by a newbie that was deleted because it was personal speculation/personal theory. LOL @pines-demon :smile:

pines-demon said:
I am under the impression that this post is not going to last long...
Edit: also did you just name an interaction after yourself?!
 
  • Like
  • Haha
Likes pinball1970, pines-demon, PhDeezNutz and 1 other person
  • #662
If it's the thread I am thinking of, it is locked (like all the OPs threads) but the message where he names it after himself is still there.
 
  • #663
The one I quoted was from a thread start by @Mykhailo Dziabura today, and it was deleted along with the infraction. Is there another thread where the OP is naming new things after themself?
 
  • #664
Yes there is. I'll report it now.
 
  • Informative
  • Like
Likes berkeman and PhDeezNutz
  • #665
Vanadium 50 said:
Yes there is. I'll report it now.
Thanks, I missed that previously (since I only skimmed his stuff). Your report will be discussed by the Mentors.
 
  • #666
Seems like a good time to remind everybody that when you see an issue in a post, please use the "berkeman Report" button to bring the problem to the attention of the Mentors. Thanks :wink:
 
  • Like
Likes AlexB23, phinds and Borg
  • #667
I’m gonna name a certain novel intermolecular interaction after “deez nutz”

Maybe one day it will bear merit……but probably not.
 
  • #668
Vanadium 50 said:
Yes there is. I'll report it now.
That post has now been edited to remove his claim to fame. Poor guy... :smile:
 
  • #669
Maybe he ought to go into politics, after all he is acting like one!🙃
 
  • #670
PhDeezNutz said:
I’m gonna name a certain novel intermolecular interaction after “deez nutz”

Maybe one day it will bear merit……but probably not.
So its catalytic reaction would be called a kick in deez nuts?
 
  • Haha
Likes Tom.G, berkeman and PhDeezNutz
  • #671
Borg said:
So its catalytic reaction would be called a kick in deez nuts?

You’re thinking way ahead of me…..and I like it!
 
  • #672
PhDeezNutz said:
I’m gonna name a certain novel intermolecular interaction after “deez nutz”

Maybe one day it will bear merit……but probably not.
We have a furry theorem, a hairy ball theorem and a Cox–Zucker machine; deez nut interaction does not sound so wacky.
 
  • Haha
Likes pinball1970 and PhDeezNutz
  • #673
pines-demon said:
We have a furry theorem, a hairy ball theorem and a Cox–Zucker machine; deez nut interaction does not sound so wacky.

Don’t forget that in Goldstein, the transformed Hamiltonian where cyclic coordinates are revealed through canonical transformations is referred to as the “Kamiltonian”. (Rhymes with “Camel”)
 
  • Haha
Likes pines-demon
  • #674
Hyperfine said:
How much of your research work do you expect others to do for you?


Need I say more?
 
  • Like
Likes pines-demon and berkeman
  • #675
berkeman said:
Seems like a good time to remind everybody that when you see an issue in a post, please use the "berkeman Report" button to bring the problem to the attention of the Mentors. Thanks :wink:
One day…..One day I will create a berkeman Batman Skylight Symbol
 
  • Love
  • Haha
  • Like
Likes AlexB23, phinds and berkeman
  • #676
That could be a great party trick --- if it's available/affordable!
 
  • #677
Vanadium50 said:
If I tell you "this is probably OK" and it is not, you will be sad. Since I don't know, I shouldn't guess.
 
  • #678
Work in progress.
IMG_1542.jpeg
 
  • Like
  • Haha
Likes hutchphd, BillTre, pinball1970 and 2 others
  • #679
“Your reasoning here is faulty. You can't do physics by waving your hands and stringing words together. “

- @PeterDonis

(I can’t quote directly because the thread is closed for moderation)

Which is true of course.

The thing that really got me was that the OP of the thread actually responded with

“Yes I can”

Yikes.
 
  • Haha
  • Like
Likes Borg, pines-demon, BillTre and 1 other person
  • #680
PhDeezNutz said:
(I can’t quote directly because the thread is closed for moderation)
That sounds like an interesting challenge...

We begin by looking at the posting history of @PeterDonis and locate a recent thread. There it is right at the top. Something about being closed for moderation.

We scroll back in that thread to find the comment in question. There it is.

We click the little "share this link" on the post to see what the URL looks like: https://www.physicsforums.com/threads/general-relativity-question-gravity-clock.1066746/post-7130447

We quote someone else's post to see what the BBcode for a quote looks like. For instance:
[QUOTE="PhDeezNutz, post: 7130482, member: 577620"]

So all we seem to need is a post number (7130447) and a member number.

Looking at the profile for @PeterDonis and extracting the URL we find:
https://www.physicsforums.com/members/peterdonis.197831/
So the requisite member number seems to be 197831.

Let us construct BBcode for the article in question:
[QUOTE="PeterDonis, post: 7130447, member: 197831"]

And test it:
PeterDonis said:
Your reasoning here is faulty. You can't do physics by waving your hands and stringing words together.

Huzzah! It works.
 
  • Like
  • Wow
  • Informative
Likes phinds, DrClaude, Rive and 5 others
  • #681
jbriggs444 said:
That sounds like an interesting challenge...

We begin by looking at the posting history of @PeterDonis and locate a recent thread. There it is right at the top. Something about being closed for moderation.

We scroll back in that thread to find the comment in question. There it is.

We click the little "share this link" on the post to see what the URL looks like: https://www.physicsforums.com/threads/general-relativity-question-gravity-clock.1066746/post-7130447

We quote someone else's post to see what the BBcode for a quote looks like. For instance:
[QUOTE="PhDeezNutz, post: 7130482, member: 577620"]

So all we seem to need is a post number (7130447) and a member number.

Looking at the profile for @PeterDonis and extracting the URL we find:
https://www.physicsforums.com/members/peterdonis.197831/
So the requisite member number seems to be 197831.

Let us construct BBcode for the article in question:
[QUOTE="PeterDonis, post: 7130447, member: 197831"]

And test it:


Huzzah! It works.
Amazed and stunned. Let me one-up you.

I just selected the text in the post, right-clicked, and selected "+Quote". Then you can add in any thread with the button "Insert quotes..." that will appear beside "Attach files" at the bottom of every thread:
PeterDonis said:
Your reasoning here is faulty. You can't do physics by waving your hands and stringing words together.
 
  • #682
jack action said:
I just selected the text in the post, right-clicked, and selected "+Quote". Then you can add in any thread with the button "Insert quotes..." that will appear beside "Attach files" at the bottom of every thread:
Yes, but did you notice that the thread in question is no longer locked? It is more challenging to quote from a locked thread.
 
  • #683
jbriggs444 said:
Yes, but did you notice that the thread in question is no longer locked? It is more challenging to quote from a locked thread.
Darn! It was locked a minute - if not seconds - before I read this thread!
 
  • #684
On a spam thread about learning how to code.

Ibix said:
Do you teach how to code spam filters, by any chance?
 
  • Like
  • Haha
Likes PhDeezNutz, DrClaude and BillTre
  • #686
fresh_42 said:
popular science articles are usually so flawed that it would take an entire lecture to correct them.
 
  • Like
Likes AlexB23, DrClaude, Tom.G and 4 others
  • #687
A new poster informed Baluncore after a disagreement, that a time will come when he will meet someone smarter.
That day was today because he was that someone!

@berkeman replied.

"Having read thousands of posts by @Baluncore and a dozen or two by you, I doubt that assertion very much."
 
  • Like
  • Haha
  • Wow
Likes Flyboy, BvU, BillTre and 1 other person
  • #688
Dale said:
bland said:
Wouldn't a high coin toss in a turbulent air flow effectively be truly random for all practical purposes?
Yes, but put the word “truly” in there and suddenly nothing qualifies. That isn’t unique to randomness.
 
  • Like
Likes pines-demon
  • #689
From a thread where a PF newbie is confused about the speed of objects and the speed of light:

phinds said:
You are mixing apples and oranges, so it's not surprising that your conclusion is bananas.

:smile:
 
  • Haha
  • Love
  • Like
Likes PeterDonis, BillTre, jack action and 3 others
  • #690
pinball1970 said:
A new poster informed Baluncore after a disagreement, that a time will come when he will meet someone smarter.
That day was today because he was that someone!
His bravado immediately lost its impact when he mis-spelled "neccesity" on the next line.
 
  • Like
  • Haha
Likes BillTre, phinds, Bystander and 2 others
  • #691
DrJohn said:
"Why can we not put just hydronium ions in pure water?"
Because you can't pick up a bucket of just one type of ion.
 
  • Like
Likes pinball1970
  • #692
Ivan Seeking said:
The future ain't what it used to be.
 
  • Like
  • Love
Likes Ivan Seeking, BillTre and pinball1970
  • #695
Fun fact: Yogi Bear was likely named after Yogi Berra, who was nicknamed Yogi by a friend because he allegedly resembled a yogi in India.
 
  • #696
kuruman said:
And no premature gesticulation, i.e. hand-waving right at the start. :oldsmile:
 
  • Haha
  • Love
Likes Rive and berkeman
  • #697
Flyboy said:
Personally I hate living in times where the poetry of history feels like a limerick instead of a haiku. 😒
 
  • Like
Likes hutchphd, phinds and BillTre
  • #698
Personally I’m too uncultured to understand the joke.
 
  • #699
PhDeezNutz said:
Personally I’m too uncultured to understand the joke.
It's a snippet from this:
Flyboy said:
History may not repeat, but boy does it rhyme.

Personally I hate living in times where the poetry of history feels like a limerick instead of a haiku. 😒
 
  • Like
Likes pines-demon and PhDeezNutz
  • #700
DaveE said:
shreddinglicks said:
Is it possible to break this pipe up into three straight pieces and model each piece as a beam experiencing transverse vibration?
Of course that analysis is possible. But it won't give you the correct answers.
 
Back
Top