Fred Hoyle , George Gamow, Daniel Bernoulli , Michael Faraday , Joseph Louis Lagrange
HAs anyone mentioned Newton or Corpenicus yet.The creator of the scientific method definetely. And any person who already made the scientific discoveries made by well known Scientists many years earlier but their work was undocumented and therefore not preserved. I totally agreed that gandhi should not received a nobel prize.He was basically the indian equivalent of the segregationist George wallaceI'm glad Ghandi never got the Nobel peace prize. It would have given the prize an honor it doesn't deserve.
Actually, that was Brown.Otherwise, Brownian motion was discovered by him too.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Brownian_motion" [Broken]wiki said:Jan Ingenhousz had described the irregular motion of coal dust particles on the surface of alcohol in 1785. Nevertheless Brownian motion is traditionally regarded as discovered by the botanist Robert Brown in 1827.
Did you know that there weren't any Nobel Prizes EVER awarded for advances in theoretical General Relativity? Even Einstein himself got the prize ostensibly for the discovery of the photoelectric effect. Since then, the field was decidedly starved for prizes. In a related field of cosmology, there was one half the prize awarded for stellar evolution, one half for stellar nucleosynthesis, and a couple for CMB, but that only covers a tiny portion of the field.
I'd expect to have seen prizes awarded to:
- Hawking and Penrose
- Friedmann/Lemaitre/Robertson/Walker/Hubble or some subset thereof
- Gamow, the father of the Big Bang (and, incidentally, a student of Friedmann)
- Arnowitt, Deser & Misner
No, Hawking and Penrose are in the list because of their contributions to understanding of large scale structure of spacetime. For example, because of thisI'm assuming you're stating Hawking do to his contributions in theoretical physics with Hawking radiation? Like many have already stated it has to be experimentally discovered or experimentally verified.
I don't think Penrose directly contributed to the Big Bang. However, after reading very limited books on the subject matter, I believe he put forth the mathematical machinery (differential topology) in defining the big bang.
Wasn't Heisenberg working for the Nazi's too? Wasn't this the reason the relationship between Heisenberg and Bohr broke down?After Nobel...uh I can only think of the one time Born was snubbed for the 1932 prize. Even though Born had worked jointly with Heisenberg (and Jordan) regarding the matrix formulation of QM, only Heisenberg was given the prize (possibly due to Jordan's connection with the Nazi's). No need to panic, though, since Born got one later for his statistical interpretation of QM.