Green function in electrostatics

AI Thread Summary
The discussion focuses on understanding the role of the partial derivative of the Green function in the surface integral of the Dirichlet problem in electrostatics. The Green function represents the potential due to a point charge, and its derivative relates to the electric field generated at the boundary surface. The surface integral accounts for the influence of the surface charge distribution, which arises from the rearrangement of charges in response to the point charge, ensuring the boundary condition is met. This physical interpretation highlights how the normal component of the electric field, derived from the Green function, contributes to the overall potential. The connection between the mathematical formulation and physical intuition is essential for grasping the concept of Green's functions in electrostatics.
Lior Fa
Messages
4
Reaction score
0
Hello,
I'm taking a course in electrostatics and electrodynamics.

We learned about finding a potentional using unique Green functions that are dependent of the geometry of the problem. Specificly on a Dirichlet problem we get the solution:

Φ(x)=∫ρ(x')G(x,x')d3x' - (1/4π)*∫Φ(x')*(∂G(x,x')/∂n')da'


I understand the idea of the Green function, but don't understand why on the second integral (surface integral) there is a use of the partial deriviative of G. Can anyone give me some intuition about it?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
The idea of the Green's function is based on Green's integral theorem, which is an application of Gauss's theorem,
$$\int_{V} \mathrm{d}^3 \vec{x}' \vec{\nabla}' \cdot \vec{A}(\vec{x}')=\int_{\partial V} \mathrm{d}^2 \vec{f} \cdot \vec{A}(\vec{x}'),$$
where ##V## is some volume and ##\partial V## its boundary surface. The orientation of the surface-normal vectors is out of the volume.

Now set
$$\vec{A}(\vec{x}')=G(\vec{x},\vec{x}') \vec{\nabla}' \Phi(\vec{x}')-\Phi(\vec{x}')\vec{\nabla}' G(\vec{x},\vec{x}')$$
Then
$$\vec{\nabla}' \cdot \vec{A}(\vec{x}')=G(\vec{x},\vec{x}') \Delta' \Phi(\vec{x}') - \Phi(\vec{x}') \Delta' G(\vec{x},\vec{x}').$$
If the Green's function now satisfies
$$\Delta' G(\vec{x},\vec{x}')=-4 \pi \delta^{(3)}(\vec{x}-\vec{x}')$$
and if ##\Phi## fulfills (Gauss units)
$$\Delta' \Phi(\vec{x}')=-4 \pi \rho(\vec{x}')$$
you have
$$\vec{\nabla}' \cdot \vec{A}(\vec{x}')=-4 \pi G(\vec{x},\vec{x}') \rho(\vec{x}') + 4 \pi \Phi(\vec{x}') \delta^{(3)}(\vec{x},\vec{x}').$$
Now integrate this over the volume ##V##, you get for ##\vec{x} \in V##
$$\int_V \mathrm{d}^3 \vec{x}' \vec{\nabla}' \cdot \vec{A}(\vec{x}') = -4 \pi \int_V \mathrm{d}^3 \vec{x}' G(\vec{x},\vec{x}') \rho(\vec{x}')+4 \pi \Phi(\vec{x}).$$
According to Gauss's Law, this equals the surface integral
$$-4 \pi \int_V \mathrm{d}^3 \vec{x}' G(\vec{x},\vec{x}') \rho(\vec{x}')+4 \pi \Phi(\vec{x})=\int_{\partial V} \mathrm{d}^2 \vec{f}' \cdot \vec{A}(\vec{x}') = \int_{\partial V} \mathrm{d}^2 \vec{f}' \cdot [G(\vec{x},\vec{x}') \vec{\nabla}' \Phi(\vec{x}')-\Phi(\vec{x}')\vec{\nabla}' G(\vec{x},\vec{x}')].$$
By definition the Dirichlet problem means that you know ##\Phi(\vec{x}')## for ##\vec{x}' \in \partial V## but nothing about derivatives of ##\Phi## along the surface. Thus you define the Green's function such that it has to fulfill the boundary condition
$$G(\vec{x},\vec{x}')|_{\vec{x}' \in \partial V}=0,$$
then you get
$$4 \pi \Phi(\vec{x})=4 \pi \int_V \mathrm{d}^3 \vec{x}' G(\vec{x},\vec{x}') \rho(\vec{x}')-\int_{\partial V} \mathrm{d}^2 \vec{f}' \cdot \Phi(\vec{x}') \vec{\nabla}' G(\vec{x},\vec{x}').$$
Since further ##\mathrm{d}^2 \vec{f}' =\vec{n} \mathrm{d}^2 a##, dividing by ##4 \pi## gives your formula.
 
  • Like
Likes dextercioby
vanhees71
thank you for the explenation.
I understand the mathematics of it and how to derive it.
What I don't understand is the physical intuition behind the derivietive of G on the surface integral.
G on the volume integral means (as far as I understood) summing up the impulse response of 1 charge at x, for all the volume V, witch makes good sense.
But the surface integral says: sum up the (known) potential product with the deriviative of G in direction of the normal to S. What is the physical meaning of this?
 
The Green's function, seen as a field ##\Phi(\vec{x})=G(\vec{x},\vec{x}')## is the solution for the situation that you have a point charge of charge ##q=1## in ##\vec{x}'## and a grounded conducting surface ##\partial V##, because it's 0 along this surface. Physically the charges within the conducting surface rearrange due to the presence of the unit charge at ##\vec{x}'## such as to fulfill this boundary condition, and thus in addition to this unit charge you have a surface charge distribution along the surface, and this surface charge distribution is given by the normal component of the electric field along the surface, but the field is the gradient of ##G##, and the contribution of this surface charge thus makes the term with the surface integral in Green's formula.
 
  • Like
Likes dextercioby
Thread 'Motional EMF in Faraday disc, co-rotating magnet axial mean flux'
So here is the motional EMF formula. Now I understand the standard Faraday paradox that an axis symmetric field source (like a speaker motor ring magnet) has a magnetic field that is frame invariant under rotation around axis of symmetry. The field is static whether you rotate the magnet or not. So far so good. What puzzles me is this , there is a term average magnetic flux or "azimuthal mean" , this term describes the average magnetic field through the area swept by the rotating Faraday...
Back
Top