Greenhouse Gas Misunderstanding?

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion centers on the role of Carbon Dioxide (CO2) in greenhouse gas effects and its impact on Earth's heat absorption. It is established that CO2 absorbs infrared radiation emitted by the Earth's surface, preventing energy from escaping into space, which contributes to atmospheric heating. The conversation highlights that while CO2 does absorb energy, its effectiveness is linked to the molecular structure that allows it to vibrate at infrared frequencies, unlike diatomic gases such as O2 and N2. The analogy of a glass greenhouse illustrates how CO2 functions similarly by allowing sunlight in while trapping heat.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of greenhouse gas effects
  • Knowledge of infrared radiation and its absorption properties
  • Familiarity with molecular structures and vibrational frequencies
  • Basic principles of thermodynamics related to energy transfer
NEXT STEPS
  • Research the specific absorption spectra of CO2 and its impact on climate models
  • Study the physics of infrared radiation and its interaction with different gases
  • Explore the greenhouse effect in detail, including comparisons with other gases like H2O
  • Investigate the role of atmospheric layers in heat retention and energy transfer
USEFUL FOR

Climate scientists, environmental researchers, and anyone interested in understanding the mechanisms of greenhouse gases and their effects on global warming.

Impavid
Messages
4
Reaction score
0
Okay so I am a first time poster, hello to my fellow scientists.

I need an expert opinion on a simple question I can't get around: I understand that Carbon Dioxide will absorb more energy from whatever radiation it comes into contact with than, say, Oxygen. That being said, I imagine the light (and other radiation/particles) breaching the atmosphere, making contact with a CO2 particle, transferring heat to it, hitting the ground, again transferring heat, going back up hitting another CO2 particle, transferring heat, and MAYBE by chance getting reflected and the efficiency of absorption is thus increased... however...

If the particle 10 miles in the atmosphere absorbs more heat, we must remember that in physics all energy transferred will be equal to energy lost in whatever your causation is. Therefore, the light has less energy than it would have had if it had not made contact with any CO2 by the time it hit the ground. After going through a greenhouse atmosphere, the energy from what gets through is weakened, and the ground itself absorbs less heat. Now here's where it all comes together...

Maybe CO2 increases the total amount of heat absorption for the Earth when we tally the numbers, but wouldn't heat transferred to an atom 10 miles above the surface virtually do nothing to heat the particles 10 miles below it? Wouldn't it be more beneficial to the earth, due simply to the insulation miles of atmosphere, for the light to transfer the bulk of its energy as deep under the Earth's skin as possible? (so as for the heat to actually have to escape to other atoms around it, which is difficult for atoms in high atmosphere because they are so incredibly far apart by comparison.)

Therefore, wouldn't CO2 cause global cooling??

Someone enlighten me. Much appreciated.
 
Science news on Phys.org
CO2 doesn't directly absorb (much) visible light.
The light from the sun goes through the atmosphere and heats the Earth's surface. The Earth then re-radiates this as infrared - which CO2 strongly absorbs, preventing the energy escaping into space and heating the atmosphere.

The IR absorption is strongest in molecules which have two different types of atoms (CO2, H2O), these bonds can vibrate at a frequency that is in the infrared band - atoms with the same element (O2 N2) have different bond energies.

The same effect happens in a glass greenhouse, sunlight goes straight through the glass on the way in and heats the inside, the infrared from the inside is blocked by the glass on the way back out.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
1K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
3K
  • · Replies 20 ·
Replies
20
Views
12K
  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
3K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
10K