- #1
falcon32
- 81
- 0
Hi everyone,
This is my very first post here, so hi!
I've got a few questions about CO2 that maybe a physics buff can help me out with. I understand the basics about CO2 warming the atmosphere via absorption and re-emission (radiatively or kinetically) of Outgoing Longwave Radiation...but can't find any in-depth details on the mechanics of it.
Conceptually, and considering only EM energy of the proper wavelength to excite CO2 molecules...
1. What percent of CO2 molecules transfer their absorbed energy kinetically, and what percent radiate?
2. Of the molecules that do radiate, what percent of these radiate a wavelength with lower energy than the one originally absorbed?
3. If lower energy is emitted, is CO2 opaque with respect to it?
These questions bring me to...
4. If CO2 is not saturated, would it absorb completely, and never emit (black when viewed in absorption bandwidth)? That is, below an effective saturation point, do we get total conversion into kinetic, not photonic?
I understand by Beer-Lambert that there is no true technical, 'saturation' point because of the logarithmic relationship, but for the sake of argument, (to help me grasp the subject) pretend there is.
Thanks, appreciate the help!
This is my very first post here, so hi!
I've got a few questions about CO2 that maybe a physics buff can help me out with. I understand the basics about CO2 warming the atmosphere via absorption and re-emission (radiatively or kinetically) of Outgoing Longwave Radiation...but can't find any in-depth details on the mechanics of it.
Conceptually, and considering only EM energy of the proper wavelength to excite CO2 molecules...
1. What percent of CO2 molecules transfer their absorbed energy kinetically, and what percent radiate?
2. Of the molecules that do radiate, what percent of these radiate a wavelength with lower energy than the one originally absorbed?
3. If lower energy is emitted, is CO2 opaque with respect to it?
These questions bring me to...
4. If CO2 is not saturated, would it absorb completely, and never emit (black when viewed in absorption bandwidth)? That is, below an effective saturation point, do we get total conversion into kinetic, not photonic?
I understand by Beer-Lambert that there is no true technical, 'saturation' point because of the logarithmic relationship, but for the sake of argument, (to help me grasp the subject) pretend there is.
Thanks, appreciate the help!